MTO Summerlin LLC v. The Shops At Summerlin North, LP

Filing 30

ORDER granting 22 Stipulation; Re: 4 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 7/6/2018. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Case 2:18-cv-00737-GMN-PAL Document 22 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 2
1 Patrick J. Reilly, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6103
2 Sydney R. Gambee, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14201
3 HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
4 Las Vegas, NV 89134
Tel: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
6
[e-mail]
7 Attorneys for The Shops At Summerlin North, LP
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, Second Floor
LAS VEGAS, NV 89134

10

11 MTO SUMMERLIN LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
THE SHOPS AT SUMMERLIN NORTH,
15 LP, a Foreign limited partnership; and DOES I
through X and ROE ENTITIES I through X,
16
Defendants.
17

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00737-GMN-PAL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
THE SHOPS AT SUMMERLIN
NORTH’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND RESPONSE TO
COUNTERMOTION FOR NRCP RULE
56(F) RELIEF
(Second Request)

18
STIPULATION

19
20

The parties to the above-captioned action respectfully submit the following second

21

Stipulation for an extension of time for The Shops at Summerlin North, LP (“The Shops”) to

22

file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on April 27, 2018, and its

23

Response to MTO Summerlin LLC’s (“MTO”) Countermotion for NRCP [sic] Rule 56(f)

24

Relief, filed June 11, 2018:

25
26
27
28

1.

On June 8, 2018, MTO filed its Response to The Shop’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (ECF No. 15).
2.

On June 11, 2018, MTO filed its Countermotion for NRCP Rule 56(f) Relief

(ECF No. 18).
Page 1 of 2
11135093_1

Case 2:18-cv-00737-GMN-PAL Document 22 Filed 06/28/18 Page 2 of 2
1

3.

On June 18, 2018, the parties filed their Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

2

Extending Deadline for The Shops at Summerlin North’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for

3

Summary Judgment and Response to Countermotion for NRCP Rule 56(f) Relief (First

4

Request).

5

4.

6

The Shop’s reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment and Response

to MTO’s Countermotion for NRCP Rule 56(f) Relief is due to be filed by June 29, 2018.

7

5.

The parties have previously requested one extension of time relating to The

8

Shop’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, or The Shop’s Response to

9

MTO’s Countermotion for NRCP Rule 56(f) Relief;

10
11

6.

This Stipulation for extension is made in good faith and is not for the purpose of

delay;

HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, Second Floor
LAS VEGAS, NV 89134

12

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, by their respective undersigned counsel, and subject

13

to the Court’s approval, agree and stipulate that the deadline for The Shops to file and serve its

14

Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to MTO’s Countermotion

15

for NRCP Rule 56(f) Relief shall be extended to July 6, 2018.

16

DATED this 28th day of June, 2018.

DATED this 28th day of June, 2018.

/s/ Sydney R. Gambee
Patrick J. Reilly, Esq.
Sydney R. Gambee, Esq.
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134

/s/ Puoy K. Premsrirut
Puoy K. Premsrirut, Esq.
BROWN BROWN & PREMSRIRUT
520 S. Fourth Street, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

17
18
19
20
21
22

Attorneys for MTO Summerlin LLC
Attorneys for The Shops At Summerlin North,
LP

23
24
25
26

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
DATED this ____ day of July, 2018.

______________________________________

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

28
Page 2 of 2
11135093_1