Switch, Ltd. v. Switch, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that by 8/10/18, the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6

SWITCH, LTD.,

7
8
9

Case No. 2:18-cv-00738-KJD-CWH
Plaintiff,
ORDER

v.
SWITCH, INC.,

10

Defendant.

11
12

In reviewing the docket in this case, it has come to the court’s attention that the parties

13

have not filed a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that

14

the “plaintiff’s attorney must initiate the scheduling of the conference required by Fed. R. Civ. P.

15

26(f) to be held within 30 days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears. Fourteen

16

days after the mandatory Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the parties must submit a stipulated

17

discovery plan and scheduling order.” Here, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint

18

(ECF No. 5) on May 24, 2018. To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan and

19

scheduling order.

20
21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that by August 10, 2018, the parties must meet and
confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.

22
23

DATED: July 20, 2018

24
25
26
27
28

C.W. HOFFMAN, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE