Song v. Wells Fargo et al

Filing 71

ORDER Granting 70 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 64 Motion to Dismiss (First Request). Replies due by 9/30/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5

Las Vegas, Nevada 89135

7 Attorneys for Defendants PHH Mortgage
Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota,
8 N.A. as Trustee for Merrill Lynch Mortgage
Investors Trust, Series MLCC 2003-A, Merrill
9 Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series MLCC
2003-A, and Michael Danlag
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
[phone] FAX [phone]

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900

6

Abran E. Vigil
Nevada Bar No. 7548
Holly Ann Priest
Nevada Bar No. 13226
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14

JAMES SONG, an individual; ADRIENNE
SONG, an individual,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiffs
vs.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF THE
RENEWED MOTION TO
DISMISS (ECF NO. 64)

MTC FINANCIAL INC. DBA TRUSTEE
CORPS; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
successor by merger to WELLS FARGO
BANK MINNESOTA, N.A. AS TRUSTEE
FOR MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE
INVESTORS TRUST, SERIES MLCC 2003- (First Request)
A; MLCC 2003-A; BANK OF AMERICA,
N.A.; PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION;
MICHAEL DANLAG, an individual; and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ROE
CORPORATIONS 1 through 10, inclusive,

24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO: 2:18-cv-00757-JCMPAL

Defendants.
Defendants

PHH

Mortgage

Corporation

(“PHH”),

Wells

Fargo

Bank

Minnesota, N.A. as Trustee for Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series
MLCC 2003-A, (“Wells Fargo”), Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series

1

MLCC 2003-A (the “Trust”), and Michael Danlag (together, “Defendants”) and

2

plaintiffs James and Adrienne Song, stipulate and agree that Defendants have up to

3

and including September 30, 2020 to file a reply in support of the renewed motion to

4

dismiss (ECF No. 64).

30, 2020. The extension will also consolidate deadlines and allow counsel for

9

Defendants to address all arguments efficiently. Accordingly, the parties have

10

requested a brief eight (8) day extension to file a reply in support of the renewed

11

motion to dismiss.

12
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135

Songs filed a counter motion (EFC No. 68), to which a response is due on September

8

[phone] FAX [phone]

for purposes of delay. Counsel requests the extension due their schedule. Further, the

7

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

This is the first request for an extension, and it is made in good faith and not

6

1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900

5

DATED: September 18, 2020.

13

THE SCHNITZER LAW FIRM

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

By: /s/ Jordan P. Schnitzer
Jordan P. Schnitzer, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10744
9205 W. Russell Rd, Suite 240
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148

By: /s/ Holly Ann Priest
Abran E. Vigil
Nevada Bar No. 7548
Holly Ann Priest
Nevada Bar No. 13226
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135

14
15
16
17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

19

Attorneys for Defendants

20
21
22
23

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:

24
25
26
27

UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE/MAGISTRATE
DATED:

28
2

September 21, 2020