Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC v. Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. et al

Filing 51

ORDER granting 50 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Stay. Status Report due by 4/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00761-RFB-GWF Document 50 Filed 03/29/19 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027 JJP@pisanellibice.com Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695 DLS@pisanellibice.com PISANELLI BICE PLLC 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 214-2100 Kevin D. Tessier, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) ktessier@reedsmith.com Karen E. Vaysman, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) kvaysman@reedsmith.com REED SMITH LLP 10 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606-7507 Telephone: (312) 207-1000 Attorneys for Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and HMO Colorado Inc. d/b/a HMO Nevada 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 SUNRISE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL 15 CENTER, LLC Plaintiff, 16 17 vs. 18 ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL SERVICE, INC. d/b/a ANTHEM 19 BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD; HMO COLORADO INC. d/b/a HMO NEVADA 20 Defendants. 21 22 Case No.: 2:18-cv-00761-RFB-GWF STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY STAY (First Request) Plaintiff Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Rocky 23 Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and HMO 24 Colorado Inc. d/b/a HMO Nevada (“Defendants”, and collectively with Plaintiff, the “Parties”) submit 25 the following Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Stay: 26 27 28 Case 2:18-cv-00761-RFB-GWF Document 50 Filed 03/29/19 Page 2 of 4 1 1. On March 14, 2019, the Parties submitted a Status Report and Stipulation to Stay 2 Discovery (the “Stipulation”) in which they reported the Parties’ agreement to pursue private 3 mediation and requested to stay discovery for fourteen (14) days to allow for the selection of a 4 mediator and mediation date. (Dkt. 45.) The Parties also stipulated to provide the Court with a status 5 report concerning the scheduling of the mediation and the Parties’ agreement as to an extension of the 6 stay of discovery pending mediation on or before March 29, 2019. (Dkt. 45.) The Court entered the 7 Stipulation and Order on March 15, 2019. (Dkt. 46.) 8 2. The Parties have exchanged proposed mediators and their efforts to select a mediator 9 and mediation date are ongoing. The Parties thus require additional time to complete the scheduling REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 of the mediation and, as such, agree and stipulate to extend the stay of discovery for an additional 11 fourteen (14) days up through and including April 12, 2019. 12 3. The Parties further agree and stipulate that, on or before April 12, 2019, the Parties will 13 provide the Court with a status report concerning the scheduling of the mediation and inform the Court 14 of the Parties’ agreement as to an extension of the stay of discovery pending mediation. 15 4. This is the Parties’ first request to extend the stay of discovery. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Case 2:18-cv-00761-RFB-GWF Document 50 Filed 03/29/19 Page 3 of 4 1 5. There is good cause to extend the stay. An extension of the stay will allow the Parties 2 to focus their continuing efforts on early resolution in an efficient manner and save the Parties’ time 3 and expense of discovery. Moreover, as no trial in this matter has been set, the requested extension of 4 the stay does not require a change to any trial date. The Parties jointly request to extend the stay. 5 Neither Party to this lawsuit will be prejudiced by the extension of the stay. 6 IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED: 7 Dated this 29th day of March, 2019 Dated this 29th day of March, 2019 8 Lapidus & Lapidus, PLC REED SMITH LLP 9 By: /s/ Daniel C. Lapidus JIM D. BAUCH DANIEL C. LAPIDUS RYAN D. LAPIDUS Lapidus & Lapidus, PLC 177 South Beverly Drive Beverly Hills, California 90212 By: /s/ Karen E. Vaysman KEVIN D. TESSIER KAREN E. VAYSMAN 10 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 In Association With: JAMES J. PISANELLI, ESQ. DEBRA L. SPINELLI, ESQ. PISANELLI BICE PLLC 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 In Association With: JOSHUA M. DICKEY BAILEYKENNEDY 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302 Attorneys for Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and HMO Colorado Inc. d/b/a HMO Nevada Attorney for Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED: UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: April 1, 2019 CASE NO.: 2:18-cv-00761-RFB-GWF 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?