Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC v. Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER granting ECF No. 53 Stipulation To Extend Discovery Stay. Status Report due by 4/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11

James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027
[e-mail]
Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695
[e-mail]
PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Kevin D. Tessier, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Karen E. Vaysman, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
10 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606-7507
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical
Service, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and
HMO Colorado Inc. d/b/a HMO Nevada

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

14

SUNRISE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL
15 CENTER, LLC
Plaintiff,

16
17

vs.

18 ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL AND
MEDICAL SERVICE, INC. d/b/a ANTHEM
19 BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD; HMO
COLORADO INC. d/b/a HMO NEVADA
20
Defendants.
21
22

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00761-RFB-GWF

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
DISCOVERY STAY
(Second Request)

Plaintiff Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Rocky

23 Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and HMO
24 Colorado Inc. d/b/a HMO Nevada (“Defendants”, and collectively with Plaintiff, the “Parties”) submit
25 the following Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Stay:
26
27
28

1

1.

On March 14, 2019, the Parties submitted a Status Report and Stipulation to Stay

2 Discovery in which they reported the Parties’ agreement to pursue private mediation and requested to
3 stay discovery for fourteen (14) days to allow for the selection of a mediator and mediation date.
4 (Dkt. 45.) The Parties also stipulated to provide the Court with a status report concerning the
5 scheduling of the mediation and the Parties’ agreement as to an extension of the stay of discovery
6 pending mediation on or before March 29, 2019. (Dkt. 45.) The Court entered the Stipulation and
7 Order on March 15, 2019. (Dkt. 46.)
8

2.

On March 29, 2019, the Parties submitted a Status Report (Dkt. 48) and Stipulation to

9 Extend the Discovery Stay (Dkt. 50) in which they reported that the Parties’ efforts to select a mediator

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10 and mediation date are ongoing and requested to extend the discovery stay for an additional fourteen
11 (14) days. The Parties also stipulated to provide the Court with a status report concerning the
12 scheduling of the mediation and the Parties’ agreement as to an extension of the stay of discovery
13 pending mediation on or before April 12, 2019. (Dkt. 50.) The Court entered the Stipulation and Order
14 on April 1, 2019. (Dkt. 51.)
15

3.

The Parties have reached an agreement as to a mediator, and the Parties’ efforts to

16 confirm a mediation date are ongoing. The Parties thus require additional time to complete the
17 scheduling of the mediation and, as such, agree and stipulate to extend the stay of discovery for an
18 additional fourteen (14) days up through and including April 26, 2019.
19

4.

The Parties further agree and stipulate that, on or before April 26, 2019, the Parties will

20 provide the Court with a status report concerning the scheduling of the mediation and inform the Court
21 of the Parties’ agreement as to an extension of the stay of discovery pending mediation.
22

5.

This is the Parties’ second request to extend the stay of discovery.

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

1

6.

There is good cause to extend the stay. An extension of the stay will allow the Parties

2 to focus their continuing efforts on early resolution in an efficient manner and save the Parties’ time
3 and expense of discovery. Moreover, as no trial in this matter has been set, the requested extension of
4 the stay does not require a change to any trial date. The Parties jointly request to extend the stay.
5 Neither Party to this lawsuit will be prejudiced by the extension of the stay.
6

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED:

7

Dated this 12th day of April, 2019

Dated this 12th day of April, 2019

8

Lapidus & Lapidus, PLC

REED SMITH LLP

9

By: /s/ Daniel C. Lapidus
JIM D. BAUCH
DANIEL C. LAPIDUS
RYAN D. LAPIDUS
Lapidus & Lapidus, PLC
177 South Beverly Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90212

By: /s/ Karen E. Vaysman
KEVIN D. TESSIER
KAREN E. VAYSMAN
10 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

In Association With:
JAMES J. PISANELLI, ESQ.
DEBRA L. SPINELLI, ESQ.
PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

In Association With:
JOSHUA M. DICKEY
BAILEYKENNEDY
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302

Attorneys for Rocky Mountain Hospital and
Medical Service, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross
and Blue Shield and HMO Colorado Inc. d/b/a
HMO Nevada

Attorney for Sunrise Hospital and Medical
Center, LLC

18
19
20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED:
UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGEJUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
DATED:

April 15, 2019

CASE NO.: 2:18-cv-00761-RFB-GWF

24
25
26
27
28
-3-