Kendrick v. Clark County

Filing 27

ORDER granting 26 Stipulation; Re: 21 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 9/19/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130 Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983 KEMP & KEMP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 6375 VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 13382 KEMP & KEMP 7435 W. Azure Drive, Ste 110 Las Vegas, NV 89130 702-258-1183 ph./702-258-6983 fax jp@kemp-attorneys.com vneal@kemp-attorneys.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Johnny L. Kendrick, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of ) ) the State of Nevada; JOHN MARTIN in his ) official and/or individual capacities; PATRICK ) SCHREIBER in his official and/or individual ) capacities; CAROLYN BANKS, in her official ) ) and/or individual capacities; and, SANDY ) JEANTETE, in her official and/or individual ) capacities, ) Defendants. ) JOHNNY L. KENDRICK, JR., Case No.: 2:18-cv-00781-JAD-GWF STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 21) (First Request) Pursuant to Local Rule (“LR”) IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff, Johnny L. Kendrick, Jr. (herein “Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, James P. Kemp, Esq., 22 23 and Victoria L. Neal, Esq., of the law firm of Kemp & Kemp, and Defendants, Clark County, et 24 al., by and through its undersigned counsel, Steven B. Wolfson, District Attorney, and Scott R. 25 Davis, Deputy District Attorney, hereby agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file a response 26 to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21), up to and including September 19, 2018. The 27 28 1 1 present deadline is September 12, 2018. Hearing on this matter is set for October 15, 2018. This 2 is the parties’ first request for an extension of time to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 3 Plaintiff’s counsel would like the additional time to thoroughly review and conduct the 4 required research of Defendants’ position and case law in order to appropriately and completely 5 6 respond to their arguments. Both of Plaintiff’s counsel have been extraordinarily busy including, 7 but not limited to, attending a two-day DIR conference, drafting an opening brief to the Ninth 8 Circuit Court of Appeals, drafting a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, 9 drafting an opening brief to the Supreme Court of Nevada, drafting complaints for which the 10 Right To Sue (EEOC) deadlines were to expire, responding to discovery requests, drafting initial 11 disclosures, drafting additional motions or replies including a motion to enforce, client meetings 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130 Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983 KEMP & KEMP for deposition and ENE prep, court appearances, and the intervening Labor Day holiday. 13 14 … 15 … 16 … 17 … 18 … 19 … 20 21 22 … … 23 … 24 … 25 … 26 … 27 28 2 1 Therefore, the parties agree that an extension of time is appropriate. 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 3 Dated: September 10, 2018. Dated: September 10, 2018. 4 5 Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, 6 /s/ Victoria L. Neal JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ. 8 VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ. KEMP & KEMP 9 7 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHNNY KENDRICK, JR. 11 /s/ Scott R. Davis STEVEN B. WOLFSON DISTRICT ATTORNEY SCOTT R. DAVIS DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY Attorneys for Defendant CLARK COUNTY, JOHN MARTIN, PATRICK SCHREIBER, SANDY JEANTETE and CAROLYN BANKS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130 Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983 KEMP & KEMP 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _____________________, 2018. 17 18 19 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE JENNIFER A. DORSEY Dated: September 10, 2018. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?