Boggs v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:18-cv-00816-JCM-CWH Document 16 Filed 02/27/19 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN
9
10
11
L. DIPAUL MARRERO II, ESQ.
GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC
400 S. Seventh Street, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone (702) 369-4161
Facsimile (702) 369-0104
Attorney for Plaintiff
TATIANA BOGGS
Stephanie L. Quinn
Nevada Bar No. 12632
Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn
8801 Folsom Blvd, Ste 230
Sacramento, CA 95826
Telephone:
(916) 400-2300
E-Mail: squinn@murphycampbell.com
Attorney for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
TATIANA BOGGS,
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
17
18
19
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a
foreign corporation; DOES I through X,
inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I
through X, inclusive,
Case No. 2:18−cv−00816−JCM−CWH
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff TATIANA BOGGS, and
24
Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY by and through their respective counsel
25
of record, that the above-captioned complaint, filed by Plaintiff, be dismissed with prejudice. Each
26
party is to bear its own fees and costs.
27
///
28
///
-1STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case 2:18-cv-00816-JCM-CWH Document 16 Filed 02/27/19 Page 2 of 3
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
DATED: February 27, 2019
GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC
4
By:
/s/ L. DiPaul Marrero II
L. DIPAUL MARRERO II, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8
DATED: February 27, 2019
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN
9
10
11
12
13
14
By:
/s/ Stephanie L. Quinn
Stephanie L. Quinn
Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn
8801 Folsom Blvd, Ste 230
Sacramento, CA 95826
Attorneys for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case 2:18-cv-00816-JCM-CWH Document 16 Filed 02/27/19 Page 3 of 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
Pursuant to NRCP.5(b), I certify that I, Tayler E. Enyart am an employee of Murphy, Campbell,
Alliston & Quinn, and that on February 27, 2019, I served a true and correct copy of the
foregoing document as follows:
3
4
5
6
7
8
MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
__X___
By electronic serve. The foregoing document was filed electronically with the
United States District Court, District of Nevada. Electronic service will be completed
automatically for all parties who are e-filers and have agreed to accept service in this matter.
The undersigned will confirm that the Notice of Electronic Filing states that the foregoing
document will be electronically mailed; otherwise an alternative method will be used.
By U.S. Mail on all parties in said action, I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope
or package addressed to the persons at the addresses shown above and placed the envelope for
collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this
business’s practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing, it is deposited in
the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with
postage fully prepaid. I am employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope
or package was placed in the mail at Sacramento, CA.
Robert D. Vannah, Esq.
L. DiPaul Marrero II, Esq.
GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC
400 S. Seventh Street, Suite 400
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: (702) 369-4161
Facsimile: (702) 369-0104
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TATIANA BOGGS
Renee Finch
MESSNER REEVES, LLP
8945 West Russell Road
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89148
rfinch@messner.com
Attorneys for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY
Melissa A. Sandoval
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY Law Department
10031 Foothills Boulevard, Suite 200
Roseville, CA 95747
Telephone: (916) 789-6132
E-Mail: msandoval@up.com
Mercedes S. Menendez
Office of the Attorney General
Public Safety Division
555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 3900
Las Vegas, NV 89101
702-486-2625
Fax: 702-486-3773
Email: mmenendez@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY
Attorneys for Creditor
State of Nevada – Medicaid
25
26
27
28
DATED THIS 27th day of February 2019.
/s/ Tayler E Enyart
TAYLER E. ENYART
-3STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case 2:18-cv-00816-JCM-CWH Document 16-1 Filed 02/27/19 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN
9
10
11
L. DIPAUL MARRERO II, ESQ.
GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC
400 S. Seventh Street, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone (702) 369-4161
Facsimile (702) 369-0104
Attorney for Plaintiff
TATIANA BOGGS
Stephanie L. Quinn
Nevada Bar No. 12632
Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn
8801 Folsom Blvd, Ste 230
Sacramento, CA 95826
Telephone:
(916) 400-2300
E-Mail: squinn@murphycampbell.com
Attorney for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
TATIANA BOGGS,
Case No. 2:18−cv−00816−JCM−CWH
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF
vs.
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a PARTIES [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
foreign corporation; DOES I through X,
inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I
through X, inclusive,
Defendants.
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties hereto, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and good cause appearing therefor,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as
25
to all claims and causes of action, and as to all parties, with each party bearing that parties’ own
26
attorneys’ fees and costs.
27
March 1, 2019
DATED: _______________
28
___________________________________
James C. Mahan
Judge, United States District Court
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?