Boggs v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 17

ORDER granting 16 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00816-JCM-CWH Document 16 Filed 02/27/19 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 9 10 11 L. DIPAUL MARRERO II, ESQ. GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC 400 S. Seventh Street, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 369-4161 Facsimile (702) 369-0104 Attorney for Plaintiff TATIANA BOGGS Stephanie L. Quinn Nevada Bar No. 12632 Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn 8801 Folsom Blvd, Ste 230 Sacramento, CA 95826 Telephone: (916) 400-2300 E-Mail: squinn@murphycampbell.com Attorney for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 TATIANA BOGGS, Plaintiff, 16 vs. 17 18 19 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a foreign corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Case No. 2:18−cv−00816−JCM−CWH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff TATIANA BOGGS, and 24 Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY by and through their respective counsel 25 of record, that the above-captioned complaint, filed by Plaintiff, be dismissed with prejudice. Each 26 party is to bear its own fees and costs. 27 /// 28 /// -1STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case 2:18-cv-00816-JCM-CWH Document 16 Filed 02/27/19 Page 2 of 3 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 DATED: February 27, 2019 GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC 4 By: /s/ L. DiPaul Marrero II L. DIPAUL MARRERO II, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 DATED: February 27, 2019 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 9 10 11 12 13 14 By: /s/ Stephanie L. Quinn Stephanie L. Quinn Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn 8801 Folsom Blvd, Ste 230 Sacramento, CA 95826 Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case 2:18-cv-00816-JCM-CWH Document 16 Filed 02/27/19 Page 3 of 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 Pursuant to NRCP.5(b), I certify that I, Tayler E. Enyart am an employee of Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn, and that on February 27, 2019, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 8 MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 __X___ By electronic serve. The foregoing document was filed electronically with the United States District Court, District of Nevada. Electronic service will be completed automatically for all parties who are e-filers and have agreed to accept service in this matter. The undersigned will confirm that the Notice of Electronic Filing states that the foregoing document will be electronically mailed; otherwise an alternative method will be used. By U.S. Mail on all parties in said action, I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses shown above and placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’s practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. I am employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or package was placed in the mail at Sacramento, CA. Robert D. Vannah, Esq. L. DiPaul Marrero II, Esq. GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC 400 S. Seventh Street, Suite 400 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 369-4161 Facsimile: (702) 369-0104 Attorneys for Plaintiff TATIANA BOGGS Renee Finch MESSNER REEVES, LLP 8945 West Russell Road Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89148 rfinch@messner.com Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Melissa A. Sandoval UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Law Department 10031 Foothills Boulevard, Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95747 Telephone: (916) 789-6132 E-Mail: msandoval@up.com Mercedes S. Menendez Office of the Attorney General Public Safety Division 555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101 702-486-2625 Fax: 702-486-3773 Email: mmenendez@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Attorneys for Creditor State of Nevada – Medicaid 25 26 27 28 DATED THIS 27th day of February 2019. /s/ Tayler E Enyart TAYLER E. ENYART -3STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case 2:18-cv-00816-JCM-CWH Document 16-1 Filed 02/27/19 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 9 10 11 L. DIPAUL MARRERO II, ESQ. GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC 400 S. Seventh Street, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 369-4161 Facsimile (702) 369-0104 Attorney for Plaintiff TATIANA BOGGS Stephanie L. Quinn Nevada Bar No. 12632 Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn 8801 Folsom Blvd, Ste 230 Sacramento, CA 95826 Telephone: (916) 400-2300 E-Mail: squinn@murphycampbell.com Attorney for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 TATIANA BOGGS, Case No. 2:18−cv−00816−JCM−CWH Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF vs. ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a PARTIES [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] foreign corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties hereto, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and good cause appearing therefor, 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as 25 to all claims and causes of action, and as to all parties, with each party bearing that parties’ own 26 attorneys’ fees and costs. 27 March 1, 2019 DATED: _______________ 28 ___________________________________ James C. Mahan Judge, United States District Court -1[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?