Frias v. Berryhill

Filing 16

ORDER granting 15 Motion to Extend Time; Motion for Summary Judgment due by 2/27/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, NSBN 13644 United States Attorney District of Nevada TINA NAICKER, CSBN 252766 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-5611 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Tina.Naicker@SSA.gov Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 SHEYLA M. FRIAS, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), respectfully moves for a 30 day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and file the Certified 20 Administrative Record (CAR). The current due date was January 28, 2019.1 The new due date for 21 Defendant’s response and filing of the CAR would be on February 27, 2019. This is Defendant’s 22 first request for extension of time. 23 24 25 26 Good cause exists to extend the current deadline because Defendant needs additional time to prepare a paper copy of the CAR and serve Plaintiff. (Declaration of Tina Naicker (Naicker Decl.) at 1 Counsel apologizes for the belated request for extension, but due to a technical and/or administrative error, did not properly calendar Defendant’s response. Counsel sought to move for an extension of time as soon as she discovered the error (Naicker Decl. at ¶ 2) Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL -1- Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15 Filed 01/29/19 Page 2 of 3 1 ¶ 2). Under current agency guidelines, instead of the electronic copy of the CAR, because Plaintiff is 2 pro see in this matter, the agency is required to prepare a separate paper copy to file and serve to 3 Plaintiff (Naicker Decl. at ¶ 3). Counsel attempted to reach Plaintiff by telephone on January 29, 4 2019, but could not reach Plaintiff as the call failed, despite repeated attempts to reach her (Id. at ¶ 4). 5 To the extent the Motion is not granted, Defendant will not be able to provide a copy of the CAR to 6 Plaintiff in order for her to prepare her Motion for Summary Judgment. (Id. at ¶ 5). Defendant makes 7 this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant respectfully 8 requests that the Scheduling Order be modified accordingly. 9 Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2019, 10 11 12 13 14 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney /s/ Tina L. Naicker TINA L. NAICKER Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL -2- Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15 Filed 01/29/19 Page 3 of 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, TINA L. NAICKER, certify that the following individual was served with a copy of the 3 DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 4 5 on the date and via the method of service identified below: 6 By U.S. Mail on January 30, 2019: 7 Sheyla M. Frias 6320 Alderlyn Ave Las Vegas, NV 89122 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2019, 11 12 13 /s/ Tina L. Naicker TINA L. NAICKER Special Assistant United States Attorney 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL -3- Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-1 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, NSBN 13644 United States Attorney District of Nevada TINA NAICKER, CSBN 252766 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-5611 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Tina.Naicker@SSA.gov Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 SHEYLA M. FRIAS, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL DECLARATION OF TINA L. NAICKER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. DECLARATION OF TINA L. NAICKER I, Tina L. Naicker, declare, as follows: 1. I am an Assistant Regional Counsel for the Office of the General Counsel, Region IX, 21 Social Security Administration. I am Special Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the 22 Northern District of California, and am the primary attorney handling the defense of this matter. I 23 make this Declaration on personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances herein and if called to 24 testify could and would do so competently. 25 26 2. On August 21, 2018, Plaintiff filed her complaint (Dkt. 7). Defendant was served on November 27, 2018. As such, the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and file Decl. of TLN ISO Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL -1- Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-1 Filed 01/29/19 Page 2 of 3 1 and serve a copy of the Certified Administrative Record (CAR) was on January 28, 2019. Due to a 2 calendaring and/or technical error, I did not accurately calendar Defendant’s response time and upon 3 learning the error, I immediately sought an extension of time. Defendant is respectfully requesting 4 additional time to prepare a paper copy of the CAR and serve Plaintiff. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3. Under current agency guidelines, instead of the electronic copy of the CAR, because Plaintiff is pro see in this matter, the agency is required to prepare a separate paper copy to file and serve to Plaintiff. As such, additional time is required in order to prepare a paper copy of the CAR to serve Plaintiff. 4. I attempted to reach Plaintiff by telephone on January 29, 2019, but each attempt resulted in “Call Failed” and I was not able to reach her by the telephone number listed on the docket. I have no reason to believe that Plaintiff would object to the requested relief and will suffer no prejudice as a result of the request for extension. 5. To the extent the Motion is not granted, Defendant will not be able to provide a copy of the paper CAR to Plaintiff in order for her to prepare her Motion for Summary Judgment. 6. The current due date for Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint was 15 January 28, 2019. The new due date for Defendant to file her response and CAR would be February 16 27, 2019. Defendant respectfully requests that the Court’s scheduling order be modified accordingly. 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the above statements are true and 19 correct. 20 21 DATED: January 29, 2019 /s/ Tina Naicker 22 23 24 25 26 Decl. of TLN ISO Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL -2- Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-1 Filed 01/29/19 Page 3 of 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, TINA L. NAICKER, certify that the following individual was served with a copy of the 3 DECLARATION OF TINA L. NAICKER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 on the date and via the method of service identified below: By U.S. Mail on January 30, 2019: Sheyla M. Frias 6320 Alderlyn Ave Las Vegas, NV 89122 Attorneys for Plaintiff Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2019, 12 13 14 /s/ Tina L. Naicker TINA L. NAICKER Special Assistant United States Attorney 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Decl. of TLN ISO Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL -3- Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-2 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 SHEYLA M. FRIAS, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 11 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. [PROPOSED] ORDER For good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Extension 14 of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and File Certified Administrative Record is 15 hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file her motion for summary judgment on or before February 27, 16 2019. All other deadlines shall be extended accordingly. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 January 31, 2019 Dated: _____________ ____________________________________________ THE HONORABLE PEGGY A. LEEN United States District Court Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 PO Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL -1- Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-2 Filed 01/29/19 Page 2 of 2 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, TINA L. NAICKER, certify that the following individual was served with a copy of the 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 4 5 on the date and via the method of service identified below: 6 By U.S. Mail on January 30, 2019: 7 Sheyla M. Frias 6320 Alderlyn Ave Las Vegas, NV 89122 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2019, 11 12 13 /s/ Tina L. Naicker TINA L. NAICKER Special Assistant United States Attorney 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PO Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?