Frias v. Berryhill
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Motion to Extend Time; Motion for Summary Judgment due by 2/27/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, NSBN 13644
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
TINA NAICKER, CSBN 252766
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5611
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Tina.Naicker@SSA.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
SHEYLA M. FRIAS,
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD.
Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), respectfully
moves for a 30 day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and file the Certified
20
Administrative Record (CAR). The current due date was January 28, 2019.1 The new due date for
21
Defendant’s response and filing of the CAR would be on February 27, 2019. This is Defendant’s
22
first request for extension of time.
23
24
25
26
Good cause exists to extend the current deadline because Defendant needs additional time to
prepare a paper copy of the CAR and serve Plaintiff. (Declaration of Tina Naicker (Naicker Decl.) at
1
Counsel apologizes for the belated request for extension, but due to a technical and/or administrative error, did not
properly calendar Defendant’s response. Counsel sought to move for an extension of time as soon as she discovered the
error (Naicker Decl. at ¶ 2)
Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
-1-
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15 Filed 01/29/19 Page 2 of 3
1
¶ 2). Under current agency guidelines, instead of the electronic copy of the CAR, because Plaintiff is
2
pro see in this matter, the agency is required to prepare a separate paper copy to file and serve to
3
Plaintiff (Naicker Decl. at ¶ 3). Counsel attempted to reach Plaintiff by telephone on January 29,
4
2019, but could not reach Plaintiff as the call failed, despite repeated attempts to reach her (Id. at ¶ 4).
5
To the extent the Motion is not granted, Defendant will not be able to provide a copy of the CAR to
6
Plaintiff in order for her to prepare her Motion for Summary Judgment. (Id. at ¶ 5). Defendant makes
7
this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant respectfully
8
requests that the Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
9
Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2019,
10
11
12
13
14
NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH
United States Attorney
/s/ Tina L. Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
-2-
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15 Filed 01/29/19 Page 3 of 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, TINA L. NAICKER, certify that the following individual was served with a copy of the
3
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
4
5
on the date and via the method of service identified below:
6
By U.S. Mail on January 30, 2019:
7
Sheyla M. Frias
6320 Alderlyn Ave
Las Vegas, NV 89122
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
10
Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2019,
11
12
13
/s/ Tina L. Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
-3-
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-1 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, NSBN 13644
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
TINA NAICKER, CSBN 252766
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5611
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Tina.Naicker@SSA.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
SHEYLA M. FRIAS,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
DECLARATION OF TINA L. NAICKER IN
SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD.
DECLARATION OF TINA L. NAICKER
I, Tina L. Naicker, declare, as follows:
1.
I am an Assistant Regional Counsel for the Office of the General Counsel, Region IX,
21
Social Security Administration. I am Special Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the
22
Northern District of California, and am the primary attorney handling the defense of this matter. I
23
make this Declaration on personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances herein and if called to
24
testify could and would do so competently.
25
26
2.
On August 21, 2018, Plaintiff filed her complaint (Dkt. 7). Defendant was served on
November 27, 2018. As such, the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and file
Decl. of TLN ISO Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
-1-
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-1 Filed 01/29/19 Page 2 of 3
1
and serve a copy of the Certified Administrative Record (CAR) was on January 28, 2019. Due to a
2
calendaring and/or technical error, I did not accurately calendar Defendant’s response time and upon
3
learning the error, I immediately sought an extension of time. Defendant is respectfully requesting
4
additional time to prepare a paper copy of the CAR and serve Plaintiff.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
3.
Under current agency guidelines, instead of the electronic copy of the CAR, because
Plaintiff is pro see in this matter, the agency is required to prepare a separate paper copy to file and
serve to Plaintiff. As such, additional time is required in order to prepare a paper copy of the CAR to
serve Plaintiff.
4.
I attempted to reach Plaintiff by telephone on January 29, 2019, but each attempt
resulted in “Call Failed” and I was not able to reach her by the telephone number listed on the docket.
I have no reason to believe that Plaintiff would object to the requested relief and will suffer no
prejudice as a result of the request for extension.
5.
To the extent the Motion is not granted, Defendant will not be able to provide a copy of
the paper CAR to Plaintiff in order for her to prepare her Motion for Summary Judgment.
6.
The current due date for Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint was
15
January 28, 2019. The new due date for Defendant to file her response and CAR would be February
16
27, 2019. Defendant respectfully requests that the Court’s scheduling order be modified accordingly.
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the above statements are true and
19
correct.
20
21
DATED: January 29, 2019
/s/ Tina Naicker
22
23
24
25
26
Decl. of TLN ISO Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
-2-
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-1 Filed 01/29/19 Page 3 of 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, TINA L. NAICKER, certify that the following individual was served with a copy of the
3
DECLARATION OF TINA L. NAICKER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
on the date and via the method of service identified below:
By U.S. Mail on January 30, 2019:
Sheyla M. Frias
6320 Alderlyn Ave
Las Vegas, NV 89122
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2019,
12
13
14
/s/ Tina L. Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Decl. of TLN ISO Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
-3-
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-2 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
SHEYLA M. FRIAS,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
10
11
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Extension
14
of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and File Certified Administrative Record is
15
hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file her motion for summary judgment on or before February 27,
16
2019. All other deadlines shall be extended accordingly.
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
January 31, 2019
Dated: _____________
____________________________________________
THE HONORABLE PEGGY A. LEEN
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
PO Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
-1-
Case 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL Document 15-2 Filed 01/29/19 Page 2 of 2
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, TINA L. NAICKER, certify that the following individual was served with a copy of the
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
4
5
on the date and via the method of service identified below:
6
By U.S. Mail on January 30, 2019:
7
Sheyla M. Frias
6320 Alderlyn Ave
Las Vegas, NV 89122
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
10
Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2019,
11
12
13
/s/ Tina L. Naicker
TINA L. NAICKER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PO Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?