Edwards v. Lattimer et al

Filing 11

ORDER denying 10 Status Report. Renewed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 7/18/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
BRENDA C. EDWARDS,

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.

17

Docket No. 10. The joint proposed discovery plan is defective for several reasons. First, the parties

18

erroneously filed it as a joint status report. Second, it does not include the required statement that

19

the parties have met and conferred about the possibility of using alternative dispute-resolution

20

processes, pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(b)(7). The joint proposed discovery plan also does not

21

include the required statement that the parties have considered consent to trial by a magistrate judge,

22

pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(b)(8). Third, many of the deadlines are miscalculated.

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//

11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
STEPHEN A. LATTIMER, et al.,
14
Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-cv-01072-JCM-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 10)

1

Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan

2

and scheduling order. Docket No. 10. A renewed joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling

3

order shall be filed no later than July 18, 2018.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated: July 13, 2018

6
7

NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-