Fletcher v. Dzurenda et al

Filing 27

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 20 , 24 , 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to the Pro Bono Program for appointment of counsel for the purposes identified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk forwards this order to the Pro Bono Liaison. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Pro Bono Liaison - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** BILLY FLETCHER, 4 Plaintiff, 5 6 vs. J. DZURENDA, et al., 7 2:18-cv-01077-RFB-VCF ORDER Defendants. 8 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF Nos. 20, 24, and 26). 9 Plaintiff is seeking for appointment of counsel because he is unable to afford counsel. Proceeding 10 in forma pauperis in this case does not grant Plaintiff the right for appointment of counsel. Plaintiff’s 11 motion is DENIED. However, given that Plaintiff has stated a potential medical need, the court is referring 12 this case to the Pro Bono Program ("Program") adopted in General Order 2019-07 for the purpose of 13 screening for financial eligibility (if necessary) and identifying counsel willing to be appointed as pro 14 bono counsel for Plaintiff Elizabeth Carley. The scope of appointment will be for all purposes through 15 the conclusion of trial. By referring this case to the Program, the Court is not expressing an opinion as to 16 the merits of the case. 17 Accordingly, 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF Nos. 20, 19 20 21 24, and 26) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to the Pro Bono Program for appointment of counsel for the purposes identified herein. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk forwards this order to the Pro Bono Liaison. 23 DATED this 5th day of March, 2020. 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?