Malone v. Williams et al
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 49 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have until and including 5/28/2021 to file their answer. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
DOMONIC RONALDO MALONE,
Case No. 2:18-cv-01146-RFB-NJK
Petitioner,
6
ORDER
v.
7
8
BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,
9
Respondents.
10
11
12
In this habeas corpus action, after an initial 90-day period, and then extensions of
13
time of 78, 60, 31 and 30 days, the Respondents were due to file an answer by April 28,
14
2021. See Order entered July 13, 2020 (ECF No. 40) (90 days for answer); Order entered
15
October 12, 2020 (ECF No. 42) (78-day extension); Order entered January 3, 2021 (ECF
16
No. 44) (60-day extension); Order entered March 1, 2021 (31-day extension); Order
17
entered April 7, 2021 (30-day extension). On April 27, 2021, Respondents filed a motion
18
for extension of time (ECF No. 49), requesting a further 30-day extension, to May 28,
19
2021. Respondents’ counsel states that this extension of time is necessary because of
20
the complexity of this case. Petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of time.
21
The Court finds that Respondents’ request for an extension of time is made in good faith
22
and not solely for the purpose of delay, and there is good cause for the extension of time
23
requested.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Extension of Time
2
(ECF No. 49) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including May 28, 2021, to
3
file their answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the
4
order entered August 31, 2018 (ECF No. 7) will remain in effect.
5
6
DATED THIS 27th day of April, 2021.
7
8
9
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?