Malone v. Williams et al

Filing 50

ORDER Granting 49 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have until and including 5/28/2021 to file their answer. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 DOMONIC RONALDO MALONE, Case No. 2:18-cv-01146-RFB-NJK Petitioner, 6 ORDER v. 7 8 BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 12 In this habeas corpus action, after an initial 90-day period, and then extensions of 13 time of 78, 60, 31 and 30 days, the Respondents were due to file an answer by April 28, 14 2021. See Order entered July 13, 2020 (ECF No. 40) (90 days for answer); Order entered 15 October 12, 2020 (ECF No. 42) (78-day extension); Order entered January 3, 2021 (ECF 16 No. 44) (60-day extension); Order entered March 1, 2021 (31-day extension); Order 17 entered April 7, 2021 (30-day extension). On April 27, 2021, Respondents filed a motion 18 for extension of time (ECF No. 49), requesting a further 30-day extension, to May 28, 19 2021. Respondents’ counsel states that this extension of time is necessary because of 20 the complexity of this case. Petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of time. 21 The Court finds that Respondents’ request for an extension of time is made in good faith 22 and not solely for the purpose of delay, and there is good cause for the extension of time 23 requested. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Extension of Time 2 (ECF No. 49) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including May 28, 2021, to 3 file their answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the 4 order entered August 31, 2018 (ECF No. 7) will remain in effect. 5 6 DATED THIS 27th day of April, 2021. 7 8 9 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?