Muric-Dorado v. LVMPD et al

Filing 191

ORDER Extending Deadlines - Discovery due by 7/6/2022. Motions due by 8/5/2022. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/5/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 1/7/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Document 191 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 CHARLES R. GOODWIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14879 GOODWIN LAW GROUP , PLLC 3100 W Charleston Blvd Las Vegas, NV 89102 Telephone (702) 472-9594 charles@goodwinlawgroup.net Attorney for plaintiff Ramon Muric-Dorado 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 9 10 11 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA RAMON MURIC-DORADO, CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Plaintiff, v. LVMPD, et. al., 13 STIPULATION AND DISCOVERY Defendants. ORDER TO EXTEND (FIRST REQUEST) 14 15 16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, through their 17 counsel of record, to extend discovery for good cause shown pursuant to LR IA 6-1. The parties 18 agree to extend discovery deadlines in this matter past their current deadlines. This is the second 19 stipulation for extension of time to conduct discovery. 20 21 DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE The parties have completed the following discovery: 22 1. Defendants served their initial FRCP 26 disclosures. 23 2. Plaintiff served their initial FRCP 26 disclosures. 24 DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED 25 1. Plaintiffs need to serve written discovery requests on defendants. 26 2. Potential deposition of parties and third parties. 27 3. Designate experts. 28 4. Any additional discovery the parties deem necessary. -1- Case 2:18-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Document 191 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 3 1 2 REASONS WHY DISCOVERY COULD NOT BE COMPLETED 3 WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE DISCOVERY SCHEDULING ORDER 4 Plaintiff’s counsel has been severely limited in his ability to speak with plaintiff. 5 Specifically, plaintiff is only allowed to visit with counsel on Monday mornings at 11am for two 6 hours. It has been difficult for plaintiff’s counsel to retrieve documents, review discovery, and 7 obtain signatures from plaintiff because the timeframe for visitation conflicts with mandated 8 court appearances. 9 Plaintiff’s counsel is pro-bono and does not have the same access to funds as traditional 10 parties in civil suits. It is taking longer to attempt to locate an expert that would be willing to 11 work on reduced fees while at the same time attempting to locate programs that can help 12 supplement expert fees. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING ALL REMAINING DISCOVERY 13 14 15 16 17 18 1. 2. 3. 4. Close of discovery: Final dates for expert disclosures: i. Initial disclosures: ii. Rebuttal disclosures: Final date to file dispositive motions: Joint Pretrial Order filing deadline 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Current 3/7/22 Proposed 7/6/22 1/6/22 2/7/22 3/2/22 1/3/22 4/6/22 5/7/22 8/5/22 9/5/22 Case 2:18-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Document 191 Filed 01/07/22 Page 3 of 3 1 2 DATED this 5th day of January 2022. DATED this 5th day of January 2022. GOODWIN LAW GROUP, PLLC KAEMPFER CROWELL By: /s/ Charles R Goodwin____ Charles R. Goodwin, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14879 3100 W Charleston Blvd Las Vegas, NV 89102 Telephone (702) 472-9594 charles@goodwinlawgroup.net Attorney for plaintiff Ramon MuricDorado By: /s/Lyssa S. Anderson____ Lyssa S. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5781 Ryan W. Daniels, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13094 Kristopher John Kalkowski, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14892 1980 Festival Plaza Dr. Suite 650 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Telephone (702) 792-7000 landerson@kcnvlaw.com rdaniels@kcnvlaw.com kkalkowski@kcnvlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant LVMPD 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 DATED this 5th day of January 2022. LAURIA TOKUNAGA GATES & LINN, LLP 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ Paul A Cardinale Paul A. Cardinale 1755 Creekside Oaks Dr., Ste 240 Sacramento, CA 95833 916-492-2000 916-492-2500 (fax) pcardinale@ltglaw.net Attorney for Defendant NaphCare, Inc. 24 ORDER 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 _____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 Dated: January 7, 2022 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?