Muric-Dorado v. LVMPD et al
Filing
191
ORDER Extending Deadlines - Discovery due by 7/6/2022. Motions due by 8/5/2022. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/5/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 1/7/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Case 2:18-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Document 191 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
CHARLES R. GOODWIN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14879
GOODWIN LAW GROUP , PLLC
3100 W Charleston Blvd
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Telephone (702) 472-9594
charles@goodwinlawgroup.net
Attorney for plaintiff Ramon Muric-Dorado
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
9
10
11
12
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RAMON MURIC-DORADO,
CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01184-JCM-EJY
Plaintiff,
v.
LVMPD, et. al.,
13
STIPULATION AND
DISCOVERY
Defendants.
ORDER TO EXTEND
(FIRST REQUEST)
14
15
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, through their
17
counsel of record, to extend discovery for good cause shown pursuant to LR IA 6-1. The parties
18
agree to extend discovery deadlines in this matter past their current deadlines. This is the second
19
stipulation for extension of time to conduct discovery.
20
21
DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE
The parties have completed the following discovery:
22
1.
Defendants served their initial FRCP 26 disclosures.
23
2.
Plaintiff served their initial FRCP 26 disclosures.
24
DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED
25
1.
Plaintiffs need to serve written discovery requests on defendants.
26
2.
Potential deposition of parties and third parties.
27
3.
Designate experts.
28
4.
Any additional discovery the parties deem necessary.
-1-
Case 2:18-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Document 191 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 3
1
2
REASONS WHY DISCOVERY COULD NOT BE COMPLETED
3
WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE DISCOVERY SCHEDULING ORDER
4
Plaintiff’s counsel has been severely limited in his ability to speak with plaintiff.
5
Specifically, plaintiff is only allowed to visit with counsel on Monday mornings at 11am for two
6
hours. It has been difficult for plaintiff’s counsel to retrieve documents, review discovery, and
7
obtain signatures from plaintiff because the timeframe for visitation conflicts with mandated
8
court appearances.
9
Plaintiff’s counsel is pro-bono and does not have the same access to funds as traditional
10
parties in civil suits. It is taking longer to attempt to locate an expert that would be willing to
11
work on reduced fees while at the same time attempting to locate programs that can help
12
supplement expert fees.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING ALL REMAINING DISCOVERY
13
14
15
16
17
18
1.
2.
3.
4.
Close of discovery:
Final dates for expert disclosures:
i.
Initial disclosures:
ii.
Rebuttal disclosures:
Final date to file dispositive motions:
Joint Pretrial Order filing deadline
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Current
3/7/22
Proposed
7/6/22
1/6/22
2/7/22
3/2/22
1/3/22
4/6/22
5/7/22
8/5/22
9/5/22
Case 2:18-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Document 191 Filed 01/07/22 Page 3 of 3
1
2
DATED this 5th day of January 2022.
DATED this 5th day of January 2022.
GOODWIN LAW GROUP, PLLC
KAEMPFER CROWELL
By: /s/ Charles R Goodwin____
Charles R. Goodwin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14879
3100 W Charleston Blvd
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Telephone (702) 472-9594
charles@goodwinlawgroup.net
Attorney for plaintiff Ramon MuricDorado
By: /s/Lyssa S. Anderson____
Lyssa S. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 5781
Ryan W. Daniels, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13094
Kristopher John Kalkowski, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14892
1980 Festival Plaza Dr. Suite 650
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Telephone (702) 792-7000
landerson@kcnvlaw.com
rdaniels@kcnvlaw.com
kkalkowski@kcnvlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant LVMPD
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DATED this 5th day of January 2022.
LAURIA TOKUNAGA GATES & LINN,
LLP
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
By: /s/ Paul A Cardinale
Paul A. Cardinale
1755 Creekside Oaks Dr., Ste 240
Sacramento, CA 95833
916-492-2000
916-492-2500 (fax)
pcardinale@ltglaw.net
Attorney for Defendant NaphCare,
Inc.
24
ORDER
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
Dated: January 7, 2022
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?