Marks v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
116
ORDER Granting 115 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines Pertaining to the Agreement Reached Between the Parties Regarding Providing Plaintiff with an Examination with an Orthopedic Surgeon (First Request). Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/24/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
KYLE L. HILL (Bar No. 16094)
Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
1 State of Nevada Way, Ste. 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
(702) 486-0429 (phone)
(702) 486-3768 (fax)
Email: khill@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Defendant Vincent Lorenz,
Jerry Howell, Gabriela Najera,
Rene Pena, and Richard Wulff
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
LOUIS MARKS,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Case No. 2:18-cv-01421-RFB-BNW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES
PERTAINING TO THE AGREEMENT
REACHED BETWEEN THE PARTIES
REGARDING PROVIDING
PLAINTIFF WITH AN EXAMINATION
WITH AN ORTHROPEDIC SURGEON
(FIRST REQUEST)
18
19
Defendants Vincent Lorenz, Jerry Howell, Gabriela Najera, Rene Pena, and Richard
20
Wulff (collectively, “NDOC”), by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General for
21
the State of Nevada, and Kyle L. Hill, Deputy Attorney General, and Plaintiff Louis Marks,
22
by and through counsel, Todd L. Bice, Emily A. Buchwald, and Daniel R. Brady, of Pisanelli
23
Bice PLLC, (collectively, “The Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree to the following:
24
25
1.
Plaintiff Louis Marks filed his Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”)
(ECF No. 92) on July 26, 2024.
26
2.
Following full briefing and supplementary briefing pertaining to the Motion,
27
this Court scheduled an evidentiary hearing for October 1, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.
28
///
Page 1 of 5
30
3.
1
After the hearing commenced, but prior to any testimony or full opening
2
statements of the parties being completed, the Parties, at this Court’s suggestion,
3
adjourned the hearing and used the time to discuss potential resolution of the Motion, and
4
if possible, the entirety of the case.
4.
5
After discussing potential resolutions, the Parties reached a mutual
6
agreement as it relates to resolving the Motion, and agreed to participate in a settlement
7
conference to be scheduled at a later date in an attempt to resolve the entirety of the case.
5.
8
9
The agreement was placed on the record; however, the Parties are still
awaiting the entry of the minute order regarding the agreement and terms set forth herein.
6.
10
In summary, the Parties agreed to the following:
a.
11
NDOC would schedule Marks for an evaluation and consultation with an
NDOC approved outside specialist within 30 days of the hearing;
12
b.
13
NDOC, through its counsel, agreed to inform Marks’ counsel of the
14
potential outside providers NDOC may use for the evaluation and consultation, while
15
allowing Marks’ counsel the ability to “veto” any one of the providers, and with no
16
guarantees being provided by NDOC, to recommend to NDOC which provider(s)
17
counsel would prefer Marks to see if possible;
c.
18
The Parties agreed to schedule the appointment as soon as possible, with
19
the hope being that the evaluation and consultation could occur within thirty (30)
20
days; however, while this was the hope, the Parties noted on the record that while the
21
appointment would be scheduled as soon as possible, there was a reasonable
22
possibility that the evaluation and consultation would not be able to take place within
23
thirty (30) days;
24
7.
NDOC also agreed to provide any Treatment Plan issued by the provider to
25
Marks’ counsel within 10 days of its receipt, and that the Parties would meet and confer
26
regarding the Treatment Plan within 15 days of Marks’ counsels’ receipt of the Treatment
27
Plan.
28
///
Page 2 of 5
30
a.
1
Should any disagreement remain between the Parties following receipt
2
of the Treatment Plan and the meet and confer to discuss the Treatment Plan, within
3
15 days after the meet and confer, either party would be able to file an appropriate
4
motion with this Court to seek appropriate relief or guidance, including the potential
5
of continuing with the adjourned evidentiary hearing;
b.
6
The Parties also agreed to have a status conference within 30 days—or
7
at this Court’s convenience—after the deadline to file a motion after the meet and
8
confer regarding the Treatment Plan.
9
8.
Consistent with this Agreement, NDOC has scheduled Marks to see an
10
appropriate provider as contemplated in ¶ 6(c), however, as anticipated at the time of the
11
agreement, the evaluation/consultation, while scheduled, will not be able to take place by
12
October 31, 2024, as hoped.
13
9.
NDOC, through its counsel, has informed Marks’ counsel of the date range in
14
which the appointment has been scheduled, and also confirmed to Marks’ counsel that the
15
appointment has been scheduled with an appropriate specialist as contemplated by their
16
agreement. Due to safety and security concerns, Marks’ counsel has agreed to not share the
17
date range with Marks or anyone, however, to the extent this Court wishes to know the date
18
range (or date) of the appointment, the Parties have agreed that NDOC’s counsel may share
19
that information with this Court in camera upon request of the Court.
20
10.
For purposes of this Stipulation, and without sharing the date range or date of
21
the scheduled appointment, the Parties hereby agree and stipulate to extend the October
22
31, 2024 deadline for the appointment to take place for up to ninety (90) days, which will
23
require the appointment to take place on or before January 29, 2024.
24
25
26
11.
The Parties confirm that the date range provided to Marks’ counsel is within
this extended deadline of January 29, 2024.
12.
As a result of this new deadline, the Parties acknowledge that the date(s) in
27
which the Treatment Plan will be provided and in which they will meet and confer to discuss
28
the Treatment Plan, as well as date in which any motions seeking this Court’s intervention
Page 3 of 5
30
1
if necessary will be filed. However, as those dates will all run from the date in which the
2
appointment occurs and the Treatment Plan is provided to NDOC and Marks’ counsel, those
3
dates will be provided to this Court by way of further stipulation once the Treatment Plan is
4
received.
13.
5
The Parties leave to this Court’s discretion as to when to schedule the first
6
Status Conference, and also continue to await this Court’s minute order as it relates to any
7
other timelines, including but not limited to the requested Settlement Conference.
This stipulation is entered into in good faith and is not made for purposes of undue
8
9
10
11
delay.
Respectfully submitted this 23rd day of October, 2024.
PISANELLI BICE PLLC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
By: /s/ Daniel R. Brady
By: /s/ Kyle L. Hill
Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534
KYLE L. HILL (Bar No. 16094)
Emily A. Buchwald, Esq., Bar No. 13442
Deputy Attorney General
Daniel R. Brady, Esq., Bar No. 15508
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Attorneys for Defendants
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiff Louis Marks
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________________
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
October 24, 2024
DATED:________________________________
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 4 of 5
30
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I certify that I am an employee of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General,
3
and that on this 23rd day of October, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing,
4
STIPULATION
5
PERTAINING TO THE AGREEMENT REACHED BETWEEN THE PARTIES
6
REGARDING PROVIDING PLAINTIFF WITH AN EXAMINATION WITH AN
7
ORTHROPEDIC SURGEON (FIRST REQUEST), via this Court’s electronic filing
8
system. Parties that are registered with this Court’s electronic filing system will be served
9
electronically. For those parties not registered, service was made by emailing a copy to the
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
AND
PROPOSED
ORDER
EXTEND
following:
Todd L. Bice, Esq.,
TLB@pisanellibice.com
Emily A. Buchwald, Esq.,
EAB@pisanellibice.com
Daniel R. Brady, Esq.,
DRB@pisanellibice.com
PISANELLI BICE PLLC
400 South 7th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89101
/s/ Connie L. Fondi
An employee of the Office of the
Nevada Attorney General
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 5 of 5
30
TO
DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?