Estate of Rex Vance Wilson, et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 40

ORDER Granting 39 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 38 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request). Responses due by 2/26/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/17/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Case 2:18-cv-01702-APG-VCF Document 40 Filed 02/17/21 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4

MITCHELL S. BISSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 011920
LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL S. BISSON
911 N. Buffalo Dr., Ste. 201
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Tel. No.: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9

ESTATE OF REX VANCE WILSON, by
administrator PETRA WILSON; PETRA
WILSON, individually, et.al.

10
11
12
13
14

Plaintiff(s),
vs.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of
Clark County, Nevada, et. al.

STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO MOTION
FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendant(s).
IT IS HEREBY stipulated by and between Plaintiffs, by and through their attorney of

15
16

CASE NO.:
2:18-cv-01702-APG-VCF

record, Mitchell S. Bisson, Esq. of the Law Offices of Mitchell S. Bisson, and Defendants, by

17
18

and through their attorney of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. of Marquis Aurbach Coffing, to

19

the following:

20

1.

21

Department (“LVMPD”), by and through their attorney of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. of

22
23

Defendants John Squeo (“Officer Squeo”) and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police

Marquis Aurbach Coffing filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 38) on or about
January 29, 2021.

24
25
26

2.

Prior to this instant Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Response to Motion for

Summary Judgment, the initial deadline for Plaintiffs to respond was February 19, 2021.

27
28

PAGE 1 OF 2

Case 2:18-cv-01702-APG-VCF Document 40 Filed 02/17/21 Page 2 of 2

1

3.

Plaintiffs’ counsel’s transition into solo practice and reorganization of firm staffing and

2

administration, along with the pandemic, has presented administrative burdens regarding the

3

filing of Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment herein mentioned.

4

4.

5

The parties herein now stipulate to extend the time to file Plaintiff’s Response to

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, from February 19, 2021 to February 26, 2021.

6
7
8
9

This extension is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED this 17th day of February 2021.
LAW OFFICES OF
MITCHELL S. BISSON

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING

/s/ Mitchell S. Bisson
Mitchell S. Bisson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11920
911 N. Buffalo Dr., Ste. 201
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Attorney for Plaintiffs

/s/ Craig R. Anderson
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorney for Defendants

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of February, 2021, that the deadline for the Plaintiffs
___
to file a Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 38) be extended
from February 19, 2021 to February 26, 2021.
___________________________________
United States District Court Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PAGE 2 OF 2