Richard Zeitlin et al v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 211

ORDER granting 208 Stipulation Re: 200 Objection/Appeal Magistrate Judge Order/Ruling LR IB 3-1. Responses due by 12/1/2021. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Case 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW Document 211 Filed 11/16/21 Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

DANIEL J. TREUDEN, ESQ
Wisconsin Bar No. 1052766
THE BERNHOFT LAW FIRM, S.C.
1402 E. Cesar Chavez Street
Austin, Texas 78702
[phone] telephone
[phone] facsimile
[e-mail]
JOEL F. HANSEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1876
HANSEN & HANSEN, LLC
9030 W. Cheyenne Avenue, #210
[phone] office
[phone]: facsimile
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

RICHARD ZEITLIN, ADVANCED
TELEPHONY CONSULTANTS, MRZ
MANAGEMENT, LLC, DONOR
RELATIONS, LLC, TPFE, INC.,
AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES,
COMPLIANCE CONSULTANTS,
CHROME BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION,
INC., and UNIFIED DATA SERVICES,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and JOHN
and JANE DOES 1-100,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER [ECF
NO. 192]
(First Request)

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, IA 7-1, and IB 3-1, Plaintiffs Richard Zeitlin,
Advanced Telephony Consultants, MRZ Management, LLC, Donor Relations, LLC, TPFE, Inc.,
American Technology Services, Compliance Consultants, Chrome Builders Construction, and Unified
Data Services, (hereinafter the “Plaintiffs”), and the Defendant Bank of America (hereinafter
“BOFA”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby jointly stipulate to modestly
extend the briefing schedule for the Plaintiffs to file a response to the Defendant’s Objection to the
Magistrate Judge’s Order. (Docs. 192 and 200.) This is the first stipulation requesting an extension of

1

Case 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW Document 211 Filed 11/16/21 Page 2 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

time to extend the deadline to respond to the Defendant’s Objection. (Doc. 200.) Plaintiffs’ response
to Defendant’s Objection is currently due November 18, 2021 and this request seeks an extension to
December 1, 2021. In support thereof, the Plaintiffs and BOFA represent as follows:
The Plaintiffs require additional time because in addition to their response to BOFA’s
objections to this Court’s Rule 30(b)(6) Order, any objection to the Court’s Report and
Recommendation on Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a first amended complaint must also be filed
on November 18, 2021. (Docs. 166 and 203.) Additionally, a person in Atty. Bernhoft’s immediate
family will undergo surgery on November 17, 2021, and he will be unavailable for a period of time
before and after that surgery. For these reasons the Plaintiffs require an extension of time to file their
response to BOFA’s objections to this Court’s Rule 30(b)(6) order.
Plaintiffs’ counsel contacted BOFA’s counsel and discussed extending the briefing deadline.
Based on those discussions, the Parties stipulate to an extended deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to
BOFA’s Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Order to December 1, 2021. (Doc. 200.) The Parties
agree that the foregoing constitutes good cause to extend the briefing schedule deadlines.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: November 9, 2021
THE BERNHOFT LAW FIRM, S.C.

Dated: November 9, 2021
SNELL & WILMER, L.L.P.

/s/ Daniel J. Treuden
Daniel J. Treuden, Esq.
Wisconsin Bar No. 1052766
1402 E. Cesar Chavez Street
Austin, Texas 78702

/s/ Holly E. Cheong
Amy F. Sorenson (NV Bar 12495)
Blakeley E. Griffith, Esq. (NV Bar 12386)
Holly E. Cheong (NV Bar 11936)
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

18
19
20
21
22
23

Attorney for Plaintiffs
Appearing pro hac vice

Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

24
25
26
27
28

__________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
DATED this 16th day of November, 2021.

2

Case 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW Document 211 Filed 11/16/21 Page 3 of 4

1

IT IS SO ORDERED:

2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Dated:

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Case 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW Document 211 Filed 11/16/21 Page 4 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6

Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on November 9, 2021, I electronically filed and served the foregoing
second JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER [ECF NO. 192] with the Clerk of the Court
for the United States District Court for the District of Nevada using the CM/ECF system.

7

/s/ Daniel J. Treuden
Daniel J. Treuden
Attorney for Plaintiffs

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4