Richard Zeitlin et al v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 245

ORDER granting 244 Stipulation Re: 200 Objection/Appeal Magistrate Judge Order/Ruling. Responses due by 1/25/2022. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/11/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Case 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW Document 245 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ROBERT G. BERNHOFT, ESQ
Wisconsin Bar No. 1032777
THE BERNHOFT LAW FIRM, S.C.
1402 E. Cesar Chavez Street
Austin, Texas 78702
[phone] telephone
[phone] facsimile
[e-mail]
JOEL F. HANSEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1876
HANSEN & HANSEN, LLC
9030 W. Cheyenne Avenue, #210
[phone] office
[phone]: facsimile
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

RICHARD ZEITLIN, ADVANCED
TELEPHONY CONSULTANTS, MRZ
MANAGEMENT, LLC, DONOR
RELATIONS, LLC, TPFE, INC.,
AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES,
COMPLIANCE CONSULTANTS,
CHROME BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION,
INC., and UNIFIED DATA SERVICES,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and JOHN
and JANE DOES 1-100,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER [ECF
NO. 192]
(Sixth Request)

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, 7-1, and IB 3-1, Plaintiffs Richard Zeitlin, Advanced
Telephony Consultants, MRZ Management, LLC, Donor Relations, LLC, TPFE, Inc., American
Technology Services, Compliance Consultants, Chrome Builders Construction, and Unified Data
Services, (hereinafter the “Plaintiffs”), and the Defendant Bank of America (hereinafter “BOFA”), by
and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby jointly stipulate to extend the briefing schedule
for the Plaintiffs to file a response to the Defendant’s Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Order. (Docs.
192 and 200.) This is the sixth stipulation requesting an extension of time to extend the deadline to

1

Case 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW Document 245 Filed 01/11/22 Page 2 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

respond to the Defendant’s Objection. (Doc. 200.) Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s Objection was
originally due November 18, 2021. Prior stipulations extended the deadline to December 1, 2021, then
to December 6, 2021, then to December 15, 2021, then to December 30, 2021, and a current due date
of January 11, 2022. (Docs. 211, 217, 227, 230, and 242.) This request seeks an extension to January
25, 2022. In support thereof, the Plaintiffs and BOFA represent as follows:
This stipulation for an extension is not intended to cause undue delay. Every attorney and
paralegal at the Bernhoft Law Firm save one has now fallen ill with either the flu or COVID-19 over
the past two weeks, and the Firm’s offices were closed last week. Attorney Bernhoft (undersigned
Plaintiffs’ counsel) is lead drafter on this response brief. He fell ill over the New Year’s weekend and
is still being treated for both flu and COVID-19. For these reasons, the Plaintiffs require an extension
of time to file their response to BOFA’s objections to this Court’s Rule 30(b)(6) order.
Plaintiffs’ counsel contacted BOFA’s counsel and discussed extending the briefing deadline.
Based on those discussions, the Parties stipulate to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to
BOFA’s Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Order to January 25, 2022. The Parties agree that the
foregoing constitutes good cause to extend the briefing schedule deadlines.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 10, 2022
THE BERNHOFT LAW FIRM, S.C.

Dated: January 10, 2022
SNELL & WILMER, L.L.P.

/s/ Robert G. Bernhoft
Robert G. Bernhoft, Esq.
Wisconsin Bar No. 1032777
1402 E. Cesar Chavez Street
Austin, Texas 78702

/s/ Blakeley E. Griffith
Amy F. Sorenson (NV Bar 12495)
Blakeley E. Griffith, Esq. (NV Bar 12386)
Holly E. Cheong (NV Bar 11936)
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

19
20
21
22
23
24

Attorney for Plaintiffs
Appearing pro hac vice

Attorneys for Bank of America, N.A.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

25
26

__________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge

27
28

DATED this 11th day of January, 2022.

2

Case 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW Document 245 Filed 01/11/22 Page 3 of 4

1

IT IS SO ORDERED:

2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Dated:

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Case 2:18-cv-01919-RFB-BNW Document 245 Filed 01/11/22 Page 4 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6

Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on January 10, 2022, I electronically filed and served the foregoing
third JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER [ECF NO. 192] with the Clerk of the Court
for the United States District Court for the District of Nevada using the CM/ECF system.

7

/s/ Robert G. Bernhoft
Robert G. Bernhoft
Attorney for Plaintiffs

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4