Edwards v. Conn's, Inc. et al
ORDER Accepting 159 Report and Recommendation. ORDER granting in part and denying in part 133 Motion for Leave to File Document as set forth in Judge Weksler's report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 FRANCINE EDWARDS,
Case No.: 2:18-cv-01998-APG-BNW
Order Accepting Report and
[ECF No. 159]
6 CONN APPLIANCES, INC., et al.,
On September 30, 2020, Magistrate Judge Weksler granted in part plaintiff Francine
9 Edwards’ motion to amend to the extent Edwards withdrew her claim under 47 U.S.C.
10 § 227(c)(5). Judge Weksler recommended that I deny Edwards’ motion to amend to add a claim
11 under the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act. ECF No. 159.
Edwards did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review
13 of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de
14 novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which
15 objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en
16 banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de
17 novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).
I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation
19 (ECF No. 159) is accepted. Plaintiff Francine Edwards’ motion to amend (ECF No. 133) is
20 granted in part and denied in part as set forth in Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation.
DATED this 15th day of October, 2020.
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?