Herndon v. Henderson Police Department et al

Filing 148

ORDER Granting 147 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Replies due by 1/5/2024. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)

Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq.
1 Nevada Bar No.: 8111
Matthew G. Pfau, Esq.
2 Nevada Bar No.: 11439
H&P LAW
3 710 S 9th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
4 702 598 4529 TEL
702 598 3626 FAX
5 [e-mail]
6 Micah S. Echols, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 8437
7 CLAGGET T & SYKES
4101 Meadows Lane, # 100
8 Las Vegas, NV 89107
702 655 2346 TEL
9 702 655 3763 FAX
[e-mail]
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
11 James M. Herndon
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

14
15

James M. Herndon,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

***
CASE NO.: 2:19-cv-00018-GMN-VCF

Plaintiff,
vs.
City of Henderson, a political
subdivision of The State of Nevada; Sgt.
M. Gillis, individually and in his official
capacity as a police officer; Officer L.
Good, individually and in his official
capacity as a police officer; Officer A.
Nelson, individually and in his official
capacity as a police officer; Officer D.
Nerbonne, individually and in his official
capacity as a police officer; Officer D.
Russo, individually and in his official
capacity as a police officer; Officer E.
Vega, individually and in his official
capacity as a police officer; Doe Officers
I through X, inclusive and Roe Entities I
through X, inclusive

Stipulation and Order to Extend
Plaintiff’s Deadline to Reply to
Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s
Motion for to Reax [ECF No. 146]

1
2
3

Defendants.
Plaintiff, James Herndon, through his counsel of record, Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. and

4 Matthew G. Pfau, Esq.. of H & P LAW, and Defendants, City of Henderson, Sgt. M.
5 Gillis, Officer L. Good, Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and
6 Officer E. Vega through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. of MARQUIS
7 AURBACH, do hereby stipulate and agree to extend Plaintiff’s deadline to reply to
8 Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Retax Costs [ECF No. 146].
9

Currently, Plaintiff’s Reply is due December 27, 2023. Plaintiff and Defendant

10 agree to extend the Deadline for Plaintiff to file his Reply to January 5, 2024. The
11 extension is being requested in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
12
13
14

Stipulation
It is hereby STIPULATED between James Herndon, through his counsel of record,

15 Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. and Matthew G. Pfau, Esq.. of H & P LAW, and Defendants,
16 City of Henderson, Sgt. M. Gillis, Officer L. Good, Officer A. Nelson, Officer D.
17 Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and Officer E. Vega through their counsel of record, Craig
18 R. Anderson, Esq. of MARQUIS AURBACH, to extend Plaintiff’s deadline to reply to
19 Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Retax Costs [ECF No. 146].
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–
_____________________________________________________________
S TI P ULATI O N A N D O R D E R

1

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendants’ Response to

2 Plaintiff’s Motion to Retax Costs must be filed by January 5, 2024.
3

WHEREFORE, the parties respecfully request that the Court enter its order

4 extending the deadline as described in the stipulation above.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

DATED this 27th day of December 2023.
Respectfully submitted by:
H & P LAW

Approved as to form and content:
MARQUIS AURBACH

Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 8111
Matthew G. Pfau, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 11439

/s/ Craig Anderson
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 6882
Reagan A. Weber, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 16151

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
James M. Herndon

Attorneys for Defendants,
City of Henderson and Sgt. S. Gillis

14
Order

15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17

28 day of December 2023.
Dated this _____

18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–3–
_____________________________________________________________
S TI P ULATI O N A N D O R D E R