Herndon v. Henderson Police Department et al

Filing 64

ORDER granting 59 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Deadlines Re: 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 12/2/2020. Replies due by 12/21/2020. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-00018-GMN-NJK Document 64 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 3 1 Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. 2 Nevada Bar No.: 8111 Matthew G. Pfau, Esq. 3 Nevada Bar No.: 11439 Cara Xidis, Esq. 4 Nevada Bar No.: 11743 H&P LAW 5 8950 W Tropicana Ave., #1 Las Vegas, NV 89147 6 702 598 4529 TEL 702 598 3626 FAX 7 mhauf@courtroomproven.com mpfau@courtroomproven.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff, 9 James M. Herndon 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James M. Herndon, *** CASE NO.: 2:19-cv-00018-GMN-NJK Plaintiff, vs. City of Henderson, a political Stipulation and Order to Extend subdivision of The State of Nevada; Sgt. Briefing Deadlines (ECF # 55) M. Gillis, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; Officer L. Good, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; Officer A. Nelson, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; Officer D. Nerbonne, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; Officer D. Russo, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; Officer E. Vega, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer; Doe Officers I through X, inclusive and Roe Entities I through X, inclusive Defendants. Case 2:19-cv-00018-GMN-NJK Document 64 Filed 11/18/20 Page 2 of 3 1 Plaintiff, James Herndon, through his counsel of record, Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. and 2 Matthew G. Pfau, Esq.. of H & P LAW, and Defendants, City of Henderson, Sgt. M. 3 Gillis, Officer L. Good, Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and 4 Officer E. Vega through their counsel of record, Nicholas G. Vaskov, Esq. and Nancy 5 D. Savage, Esq. of CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, do hereby stipulate and agree to 6 Extend the due dates of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants, Sgt. M. Gillis, Officer L. 7 Good, Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and Officer E. Vega’s 8 Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Reply in Support to Defendants, Sgt. 9 M. Gillis, Officer L. Good, Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, 10 and Officer E. Vega’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 11 Currently, Plaintiff’s Opposition is due November 16, 2020. Plaintiff and 12 Defendant agree to Extend the Deadline for Plaintiff to file his Opposition to 13 December 2, 2020 and for Defendant to file their Reply in Support to 14 December 21, 2020. The extensions are being requested in good faith and not for 15 the purpose of delay. The extensions are being requested as the issues to be briefed 16 are extensive and complicated. The parties anticipate that additional time, from that 17 provided in the applicable court rules, will be needed to adequately address the 18 issues and complete their respective briefings for submission to the court. 19 20 21 Stipulation It is hereby STIPULATED between James Herndon, through his counsel of record, 22 Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. and Matthew G. Pfau, Esq.. of H & P LAW, and Defendants, 23 City of Henderson, Sgt. M. Gillis, Officer L. Good, Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. 24 Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and Officer E. Vega through their counsel of record, 25 Nicholas G. Vaskov, Esq. and Nancy D. Savage, Esq. of CITY AT TORNEY’S OFFICE, 26 to Extend Breifing Deadlines Related to Defendants, Sgt. M. Gillis, Officer L. Good, 27 Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and Officer E. Vega’s Motion 28 for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Reply in Support to Defendants, Sgt. M. –2– _____________________________________________________________ S TI P ULATI O N A N D O R D E R TO E XT EN D C E RTA IN D EA D L IN ES E C F # 5 5 Case 2:19-cv-00018-GMN-NJK Document 64 Filed 11/18/20 Page 3 of 3 1 Gillis, Officer L. Good, Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and 2 Officer E. Vega’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF # 55. 3 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant, Sgt. M. 4 Gillis, Officer L. Good, Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and 5 Officer E. Vega’s Motion for Summary Judgment must be filed by December 2, 2020. 6 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Defendants, Sgt. M. Gillis, Officer L. Good, 7 Officer A. Nelson, Officer D. Nerbonne, Officer D. Russo, and Officer E. Vega’s Reply 8 in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment must be filed by December 21, 2020. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DATED this 10th day of November 2020. Respectfully submitted by: H & P LAW /s/ Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. Marjorie L. Hauf, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 8111 Matthew G. Pfau, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 11439 16 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff, James M. Herndon Approved as to form and content: CITY AT TORNEY’S OFFICE /s/ Nancy Savage, Esq. Nicholas G. Vaskov, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 8298 Nancy D. Savage, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 392 Attorneys for Defendants, City of Henderson, Sgt. S. Gillis, and Officers L. Good, A. Nelson, D. Nerbonne, D. Russo, and E. Vega 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this ____ day of November, 2020 18 22 23 24 25 ___________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 26 27 28 –3– _____________________________________________________________ S TI P ULATI O N A N D O R D E R TO E XT EN D C E RTA IN D EA D L IN ES E C F # 5 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?