Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance et al

Filing 77

ORDER Granting 68 First Motion to Extend Time Re: 60 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 5/8/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15
16
17

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
ERIC STEINMETZ,

18

Plaintiffs,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

vs.
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE; CAPITAL
ONE; CONN CREDIT CORP.; EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC;
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.; INNOVIS DATA SOLUTIONS, INC.;
MACYS/DSNB; MECHANICS BANK FKA
CRB; and TRANS UNION LLC,

Case No.: 2:19-cv-00064-GMN-VCF
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION
TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT
[FIRST REQUEST]

Defendants.

27
28

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED
COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST] - 1

1

Plaintiff Eric Steinmetz (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant American Honda Finance (“AHF”)

2

(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby move jointly to extend

3
4
5

Plaintiff’s deadline to file a Response to AHF’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (21)
twenty-one days:

6

1.

On January 10, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].

7

2.

On February 25, 2019, Experian filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF

8

Dkt.32].

9

3.

11

On March 11, 2019, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 44].

4.

10

On April 3, 2019 AHF filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint [ECF

12

Dkt. 60].

13

5.

Plaintiff’s Response is due April 17, 2019.

14

6.

Plaintiff and AHF have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s response twenty-one days in

15
16
17

order to allow Plaintiffs’ counsel to contact the clients to address AHF’S pending motion to dismiss
and obtain approval to file the response. As a result, both Plaintiff and AHF hereby request this

18

Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to respond to AHF’s Motion to Dismiss Amended

19

Complaint until May 8, 2019. This stipulation is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay,

20

and is not filed for an improper purpose.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

//
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED
COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST] - 2

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2

Dated April 15, 2019.

3
4

KNEPPER & CLARK LLC

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN &
DICKER LLP

/s/ Miles N. Clark
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

/s/ Chad C. Butterfield
Chad C. Butterfield, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10532
300 South Fourth St., 11th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

15

HAINES & KRIEGER LLC
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Email: [e-mail]

16

Counsel for Defendant
American Honda Finance.

Counsel for Plaintiff

12
13
14

Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance et al
2:19-cv-00064-GMN-VCF

17
18
19
20

ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

29
Dated this_____day of April, 2019.

________________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE