Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance et al
Filing
70
ORDER granting 67 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply; ORDER granting 68 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply; Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
JACQUELINE STEINMETZ,
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
v.
13
ORDER
AMERICA HONDA FINANCE, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
Case No. 2:19-cv-00067-APG-GWF
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply (ECF Nos.
67, 68), filed on April 29, 2019.
14
Plaintiff requests leave to file a five page sur-reply to address new evidence introduced by
15
Defendant Experience Information Solutions, Inc. in its reply in support of its motion to stay and
16
for a protective order. ECF Nos. 65, 66. A party is permitted to file a sur-reply only by leave of
17
court and motions for leave to file a sur-reply are discouraged. See LR 7-2(b). The Court may
18
grant leave to file a sur-reply if new matters are raised for the first time in the reply to which a
19
party would otherwise be unable to respond. See United States v. Ormat Indus., Ltd, 2016 WL
20
1298119, at *6 (D. Nev. Apr. 1, 2016). The Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s request.
21
Accordingly,
22
23
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions for Leave to File Sur-reply (ECF
Nos. 67, 68) are granted.
Dated this 1st day of May, 2019.
25
26
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?