Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance et al

Filing 90

ORDER granting 89 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 47 Motion to Dismiss, Replies due by 6/5/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1
2
3
4
5

Chad C. Butterfield, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 010532
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
[phone]; FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

JACQUELINE STEINMETZ

Case No.: 2:19-cv-00067-APG-GWF

Plaintiff,

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR AMERICAN HONDA
v.
FINANCE CORPORATION TO FILE A
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE; CHASE
DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
CARD; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, COMPLAINT
LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.; INNOVIS DATA
(First Request)
SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION LLC; AND
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, LLC,
ORDER
Defendants.

15
16

Defendant, AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION (erroneously sued as

17

American Honda Finance, and hereinafter “AHFC”), by and through its counsel of record, CHAD C.

18

BUTTERFIELD, ESQ., of the law firm WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER

19

LLP, and Plaintiff, JACQUELINE STEINMETZ, by and through her counsel of record, MILES N.

20

CLARK, ESQ. of the law firm KNEPPER & CLARK LLC hereby jointly move to extend AHFC’s

21

deadline to file a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint by seven (7) days.

22

1.
2.

On March 11, 2019, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 28).

4.

On April 3, 2019, AHFC filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No.

5.

24

On March 1, 2019, AHFC filed an Answer to the Complaint (ECF No. 23).

3.

23

On January 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1).

On May 22, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Response to AHFC’s Motion to Dismiss the

25
26
27
28

47).

Amended Complaint (ECF No. 87).
1
1469938V.1

1

6.

AHFC and Plaintiff have agreed to extend the deadline for AHFC to file its Reply in

2

Support of Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint by seven (7) days to allow AHFC to further

3

consider the issues in Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss, as well as to continue exploration

4

of the resolution of this case. As a result, both AHFC and Plaintiff request this Court to further extend

5

the date for AHFC to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint until June

6

5, 2019. This joint motion is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed for an

7

improper purpose.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED

9

DATED this 29th day of May, 2019.
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

10
11

/s/ Chad C. Butterfield
Chad C. Butterfield, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10532
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Defendant American Honda
Finance Corporation

12
13
14
15
16

DATED this 29th day of May, 2019.
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC

17
/s/ Miles N. Clark
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Attorney for Plaintiff Jacqueline Steinmetz

18
19
20
21
22
23

ORDER

24

GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: May 29, 2019.
Dated this _____ day of _____________, 2019.

26
27
________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28

2
1469938V.1