Reed v. Dzurenda et al

Filing 66

ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff David Reed's objection (ECF No. 60 ) is Denied as Moot Without Prejudice to Reed filing another motion to extend time. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 DAVID LEVOYD REED,

Case No. 2:19-cv-00172-APG-NJK

Plaintiff

Order Denying Objection

4
5
6

v.

[ECF No. 60]

JAMES DZURENDA et al.,
Defendants

7
8

Plaintiff David Reed filed a motion to extend time and then objected to Magistrate Judge

9 Koppe’s order denying his motion. ECF Nos. 58-60. Thereafter, defendant Ted Nielson moved
10 to extend the dispositive motions deadline, which Judge Koppe granted. ECF Nos. 63, 65. It is
11 unclear from Reed’s motion and objection what deadlines he sought to extend. It appears that
12 his objection is moot, however, given the extension of the dispositive motions deadline. I
13 therefore deny the objection as moot. If Reed seeks to extend other case deadlines, he may file a
14 new, properly supported motion specifying what deadlines he seeks to extend.
15

I THEREFORE ORDER that plaintiff David Reed’s objection (ECF No. 60) is denied as

16 moot without prejudice to Reed filing another motion to extend time.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Dated this 19th day of November, 2021.
________________________________
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE