Reed v. Dzurenda et al

Filing 66

ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff David Reed's objection (ECF No. 60 ) is Denied as Moot Without Prejudice to Reed filing another motion to extend time. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DAVID LEVOYD REED, Case No. 2:19-cv-00172-APG-NJK Plaintiff Order Denying Objection 4 5 6 v. [ECF No. 60] JAMES DZURENDA et al., Defendants 7 8 Plaintiff David Reed filed a motion to extend time and then objected to Magistrate Judge 9 Koppe’s order denying his motion. ECF Nos. 58-60. Thereafter, defendant Ted Nielson moved 10 to extend the dispositive motions deadline, which Judge Koppe granted. ECF Nos. 63, 65. It is 11 unclear from Reed’s motion and objection what deadlines he sought to extend. It appears that 12 his objection is moot, however, given the extension of the dispositive motions deadline. I 13 therefore deny the objection as moot. If Reed seeks to extend other case deadlines, he may file a 14 new, properly supported motion specifying what deadlines he seeks to extend. 15 I THEREFORE ORDER that plaintiff David Reed’s objection (ECF No. 60) is denied as 16 moot without prejudice to Reed filing another motion to extend time. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Dated this 19th day of November, 2021. ________________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?