Navajo Health Foundation - Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Razaghi Development Company, LLC et al
Filing
111
ORDER denying 110 Motion for Protective Order; Re: 72 Motion for Protective Order. Responses due by 12/1/2020. Reply shall be due seven court days after Plaintiff's response is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 11/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:19-cv-00329-GMN-EJY Document 111 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
5
6
NAVAJO HEALTH FOUNDATION –
SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC.
(doing business as “Sage Memorial
Hospital”); an Arizona non-profit
corporation,
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Case No. 2:19-cv-00329-GMN-EJY
ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
RAZAGHI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,
LLC; a Nevada limited liability company
(doing business as “Razaghi Healthcare”),
AHMAD R. RAZAGHI; individually,
TAUSIF HASAN; individually, DOES 1-10;
ROES A-Z;
Defendants.
14
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Emergency Motion for Protective Order Regarding
15
Subpoena Issued by Plaintiff as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ECF No. 110. Defendants seek an
16
expedited order staying enforcement of Plaintiff’s second non-party subpoena directed to Wells
17
Fargo Bank, N.A., which currently has a due date of December 3, 2020. Id. at 2 and 6.
18
A district court has wide discretion in controlling discovery. Little v. City of Seattle, 863
19
F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988). Exercising its discretion, the Court temporarily stays the due date of
20
Plaintiff’s second non-party subpoena directed to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. allowing Defendants’
21
Emergency Motion to be heard in the ordinary course.
22
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Emergency Motion for Protective
23
Order Regarding Subpoena Issued by Plaintiff as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (ECF No. 110) is
24
DENIED; provided, however, that the Motion for Protective Order shall be heard in the ordinary
25
course. Plaintiff’s response thereto shall be due on or before December 1, 2020. Defendants’ reply
26
shall be due seven court days after Plaintiff’s response is filed. The Court’s Order will follow.
27
28
1
Case 2:19-cv-00329-GMN-EJY Document 111 Filed 11/18/20 Page 2 of 2
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the due date of Plaintiff’s second non-party subpoena
2
directed to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is temporarily STAYED until such time as the Court issues its
3
decision on Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel for Plaintiff shall notify Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
5
that the response date for the subpoena is temporarily stayed such that no response to the subpoena
6
is due on December 3, 2020.
7
DATED this 18th day of November, 2020.
8
9
10
ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?