Meza-Perez v. Sbarro LLC, et al

Filing 193

ORDER granting 192 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Reply to 180 Motion for Attorney Fees; Replies due by 1/20/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-00373-APG-NJK Document 193 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2 1 6 MARK E. FERRARIO Nevada Bar No. 1625 JASON K. HICKS Nevada Bar No. 13149 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 10845 Griffith Peak Drive, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702) 792-3773 Fax: (702) 792-9002 Email: ferrariom@gtlaw.com hicksja@gtlaw.com 7 Attorneys for Dana Dorado 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 Greenberg Traurig, LLP 10845 Griffith Peak Drive, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 (702) 792-3773 (702) 792-9002 (fax) 11 SANDRA M. MEZA-PEREZ, an individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 v. SBARRO LLC dba SBARRO PIZZA, a foreign limited liability company; SBARRO, INC. dba SBARRO PIZZA, a foreign corporation; ZACHARY CEBALLES, an individual; EFRAIN HERNANDEZ, an individual; JESUS ALATORRE, an individual; DANA DORADO, an individual, 18 Defendants. Case No.: 2:19-cv-373-APG-NJK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DANA DORADO TO SUBMIT HER REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO THE COURT’S ORDER GRANTING RULE 11 SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL [ECF 180] (First Request) 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED by and between Plaintiff’s counsel 21 Melanie Hill and Hardeep Sull on the one hand and Dana Dorado on the other, through their 22 respective counsel and pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, that the Court extend 23 the deadline for Ms. Dorado to submit her Reply in support of her Motion for Attorney’s Fees and 24 Costs Pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting Rule 11 Sanctions (the “Motion”), up to, and 25 including, January 20, 2021. This stipulation is made and based upon the following: 26 27 1. On September 30, 2020, the Court entered an order granting Ms. Dorado’s Motion for Sanctions under Rule 11. ECF No. 177. 28 Error! Unknown document property name. Page 1 of 2 Case 2:19-cv-00373-APG-NJK Document 193 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2 1 2. That order directed Ms. Hill, Ms. Sull, and Ms. Dorado to confer about the amount 2 of fees and costs to be awarded pursuant to that order and, if they could not agree, to brief the matter 3 for the Court. 4 5 3. The parties were unable to agree on the amount of costs and fees to be awarded therefore Ms. Dorado submitted the Motion on November 30, 2020. 6 4. By stipulation, Ms. Hill and Ms. Sull submitted their opposition to the Motion on 7 January 4, 2021. 8 5. Ms. Dorado’s reply is currently due on January 11, 2021. 9 6. Ms. Hill, Ms. Sull, and Ms. Dorado agree and request that Ms. Dorado have up to, and including, January 20, 2021, to file her reply in support of the Motion. This request is made 11 Greenberg Traurig, LLP 10845 Griffith Peak Drive, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 (702) 792-3773 (702) 792-9002 (fax) 10 in order to accommodate competing obligations held by Ms. Dorado’s counsel and agreed to by 12 Ms. Hill’s and Ms. Sull’s counsel as a professional courtesy. 13 7. This is the first request for the relief sought herein, made in good faith and not for 14 purposes of delay. 15 Dated this 8th day of January 2021. Dated this 8th day of January 2021. /s/ Joseph Garin JOSEPH P. GARIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6653 LIPSON NEILSON P.C. 990 Covington Cross Dr., Suite 120 Las Vegas, NV 89144 /s/ Jason K. Hicks MARK E. FERRARIO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1625 JASON K. HICKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13149 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 10845 Griffith Peak Drive, Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89135 16 17 18 19 20 21 Counsel for Melanie Hill and Hardeep Sull Counsel for Dana Dorado 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 8th Dated this ___ day of January 2021. 27 28 Error! Unknown document property name. Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?