Muhammad v. CCSD et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Stipulation; Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 5/20/2020. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 21 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12396 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Telephone: (702) 799-5373 Facsimile: (702) 799-7243 Herrec4@nv.ccsd.net Attorney for Defendants 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 A.M., a minor by and through her natural parent and guardian, ZARINAH MUHAMMAD; ZARINAH MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Case No.: 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE UNDER ECF NO. 13 v. (SECOND REQUEST) CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; JESUS JARA; A.J. ADAMS; FELICIA GONZALES; DIANE LEWIS; CHRISTOPHER SPARROW; JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS I THROUGH X; and, ROE ENTITIES I THROUGH X 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs A.M., a minor by and through her natural parent and guardian, ZARINAH MUHAMMAD and ZARINAH MUHAMMAD (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants CLARK COUNTYSCHOOL DISTRICT; JESUS JARA; A.J. ADAMS; FELICIA GONZALES; DIANE LEWIS; and CHRISTOPHER SPARROW (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to Local Rule 7-1 as follows: 1. Whereas, on March 9, 2020, the Court held a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4). The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint and ordered Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 21 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 3 1 Plaintiffs to file the amended complaint by March 30, 2020. ECF No. 13. The Court also ordered 2 the parties to file a joint discovery plan/scheduling order by April 6, 2020, but did not prohibit the 3 parties from renewing a request to stay of discovery. ECF No. 13. 2. 4 5 Whereas, the parties were unable to meet the deadlines set by the Court on March 9, 2020 (ECF No. 13) due to the unexpected pandemic and the effects of the same. 3. 6 Whereas, the parties agreed and the Court approved a 30-day extension to the 7 deadlines set by the Court on March 9, 2020. ECF Nos. 14 and 15. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint 8 would be due April 29, 2020, while the parties’ joint discovery plan/scheduling order would be 9 due May 6, 2020. 10 4. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on April 30, 2020. ECF No. 18. Defendants 11 are still evaluating the allegations in the amended complaint, but anticipate filing a motion to 12 dismiss. Accordingly, a request to stay discovery pending a decision on the motion may be 13 renewed. 14 5. Whereas, the parties seek an additional two weeks to file a joint discovery 15 plan/scheduling order or request to stay discovery in the case. The deadline would be May 20, 16 2020. 17 … 18 … 19 … 20 … 21 … 22 … 23 … 24 … 25 … 26 … 27 28 Page 2 of 3 Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 21 Filed 05/06/20 Page 3 of 3 1 6. Whereas, this is the second request for an extension regarding the filing of a 2 stipulated discovery plan/scheduling order, which is made in good faith, not for the purposes of 3 delay, and neither party is prejudiced by the extension. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: May 6, 2020 DATED: May 6, 2020 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL JUSTICE FORCE LAW GOUP LLC By: /s/ Crystal J. Herrera Crystal J. Herrera (#12396) 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, NV, 89146 Attorney for the Defendants By: /s/ Zarinah J. Muhammad Zarinah J. Muhammad (#12830) 6278 Ruby Kinglet Las Vegas, NV, 89148 Attorney for the Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED __________________________________ DATED:this 6th day of May, 2020. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?