Muhammad v. CCSD et al
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Stipulation; Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 5/20/2020. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 21 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12396
5100 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Telephone: (702) 799-5373
Facsimile: (702) 799-7243
Herrec4@nv.ccsd.net
Attorney for Defendants
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
A.M., a minor by and through her natural
parent and guardian, ZARINAH
MUHAMMAD; ZARINAH MUHAMMAD
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Case No.: 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE
UNDER ECF NO. 13
v.
(SECOND REQUEST)
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT;
JESUS JARA; A.J. ADAMS; FELICIA
GONZALES; DIANE LEWIS;
CHRISTOPHER SPARROW; JOHN DOE
DEFENDANTS I THROUGH X; and, ROE
ENTITIES I THROUGH X
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs A.M., a minor by and through her natural parent and guardian, ZARINAH
MUHAMMAD and ZARINAH MUHAMMAD (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants CLARK
COUNTYSCHOOL DISTRICT; JESUS JARA; A.J. ADAMS; FELICIA GONZALES; DIANE
LEWIS; and CHRISTOPHER SPARROW (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of
record, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to Local Rule 7-1 as follows:
1.
Whereas, on March 9, 2020, the Court held a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss (ECF No. 4). The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint and ordered
Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 21 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 3
1
Plaintiffs to file the amended complaint by March 30, 2020. ECF No. 13. The Court also ordered
2
the parties to file a joint discovery plan/scheduling order by April 6, 2020, but did not prohibit the
3
parties from renewing a request to stay of discovery. ECF No. 13.
2.
4
5
Whereas, the parties were unable to meet the deadlines set by the Court on March
9, 2020 (ECF No. 13) due to the unexpected pandemic and the effects of the same.
3.
6
Whereas, the parties agreed and the Court approved a 30-day extension to the
7
deadlines set by the Court on March 9, 2020. ECF Nos. 14 and 15. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint
8
would be due April 29, 2020, while the parties’ joint discovery plan/scheduling order would be
9
due May 6, 2020.
10
4.
Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on April 30, 2020. ECF No. 18. Defendants
11
are still evaluating the allegations in the amended complaint, but anticipate filing a motion to
12
dismiss. Accordingly, a request to stay discovery pending a decision on the motion may be
13
renewed.
14
5.
Whereas, the parties seek an additional two weeks to file a joint discovery
15
plan/scheduling order or request to stay discovery in the case. The deadline would be May 20,
16
2020.
17
…
18
…
19
…
20
…
21
…
22
…
23
…
24
…
25
…
26
…
27
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 21 Filed 05/06/20 Page 3 of 3
1
6.
Whereas, this is the second request for an extension regarding the filing of a
2
stipulated discovery plan/scheduling order, which is made in good faith, not for the purposes of
3
delay, and neither party is prejudiced by the extension.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DATED: May 6, 2020
DATED: May 6, 2020
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
JUSTICE FORCE LAW GOUP LLC
By: /s/ Crystal J. Herrera
Crystal J. Herrera (#12396)
5100 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV, 89146
Attorney for the Defendants
By: /s/ Zarinah J. Muhammad
Zarinah J. Muhammad (#12830)
6278 Ruby Kinglet
Las Vegas, NV, 89148
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED __________________________________
DATED:this 6th day of May, 2020.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?