Muhammad v. CCSD et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Stipulation; Answer to Second Amended Complaint due 5/18/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 23 Filed 05/15/20 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12396
5100 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Telephone: (702) 799-5373
Facsimile: (702) 799-7243
Herrec4@nv.ccsd.net
Attorney for Defendants
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
A.M., a minor by and through her natural
parent and guardian, ZARINAH
MUHAMMAD; ZARINAH MUHAMMAD
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
v.
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT;
JESUS JARA; A.J. ADAMS; FELICIA
GONZALES; DIANE LEWIS;
CHRISTOPHER SPARROW; JOHN DOE
DEFENDANTS I THROUGH X; and, ROE
ENTITIES I THROUGH X
Case No.: 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND THE TIME WITHIN WHICH
DEFENDANTS MAY ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs A.M., a minor by and through her natural parent and guardian, ZARINAH
MUHAMMAD and ZARINAH MUHAMMAD (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants CLARK
COUNTYSCHOOL DISTRICT; JESUS JARA; A.J. ADAMS; FELICIA GONZALES; DIANE
LEWIS; and CHRISTOPHER SPARROW (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of
record, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to Local Rule 7-1 as follows:
Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 23 Filed 05/15/20 Page 2 of 3
1.
1
Whereas, on March 9, 2020, the Court held a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to
2
Dismiss (ECF No. 4). The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint and ordered
3
Plaintiffs to file the amended complaint by March 30, 2020. ECF No. 13.
2.
4
5
Whereas, Plaintiffs were unable to meet the deadline set by the Court on March 9,
2020 (ECF No. 13) due to the unexpected pandemic and the effects of the same.
3.
6
Whereas, the parties agreed and the Court approved a 30-day extension to the
7
deadlines set by the Court on March 9, 2020. ECF Nos. 14 and 15. More specifically, Plaintiffs’
8
amended complaint would be due April 29, 2020, while the parties’ joint discovery
9
plan/scheduling order or request for a stay of discovery would be due May 6, 2020.
4.
10
11
Whereas, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on April 30, 2020. ECF No.
18. Defendants’ response is due May 14, 2020. Fed R. Civ. P. 15 (a)(3).
5.
12
Whereas, due to unexpected scheduling conflicts, the parties agree to an additional
13
four (4) day extension of time through May 18 2020, for Defendants to respond to the second
14
amended complaint. ECF No. 18.
15
…
16
…
17
…
18
…
19
…
20
…
21
…
22
…
23
…
24
…
25
…
26
…
27
…
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 23 Filed 05/15/20 Page 3 of 3
1
6.
Whereas, this is the first request for an extension regarding the filing of Defendants’
2
response to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, which is made in good faith, not for the
3
purposes of delay, and neither party is prejudiced by the short extension.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DATED: May 14, 2020
DATED: May 14, 2020
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
JUSTICE FORCE LAW GOUP LLC
By: /s/ Crystal J. Herrera
Crystal J. Herrera (#12396)
5100 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV, 89146
Attorney for the Defendants
By: /s/ Zarinah J. Muhammad
Zarinah J. Muhammad (#12830)
6278 Ruby Kinglet
Las Vegas, NV, 89148
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5-15-2020
DATED: __________________________________
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?