Muhammad v. CCSD et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Stipulation; Answer to Second Amended Complaint due 5/18/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 23 Filed 05/15/20 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12396 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Telephone: (702) 799-5373 Facsimile: (702) 799-7243 Herrec4@nv.ccsd.net Attorney for Defendants 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 A.M., a minor by and through her natural parent and guardian, ZARINAH MUHAMMAD; ZARINAH MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; JESUS JARA; A.J. ADAMS; FELICIA GONZALES; DIANE LEWIS; CHRISTOPHER SPARROW; JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS I THROUGH X; and, ROE ENTITIES I THROUGH X Case No.: 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANTS MAY ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs A.M., a minor by and through her natural parent and guardian, ZARINAH MUHAMMAD and ZARINAH MUHAMMAD (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants CLARK COUNTYSCHOOL DISTRICT; JESUS JARA; A.J. ADAMS; FELICIA GONZALES; DIANE LEWIS; and CHRISTOPHER SPARROW (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to Local Rule 7-1 as follows: Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 23 Filed 05/15/20 Page 2 of 3 1. 1 Whereas, on March 9, 2020, the Court held a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to 2 Dismiss (ECF No. 4). The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint and ordered 3 Plaintiffs to file the amended complaint by March 30, 2020. ECF No. 13. 2. 4 5 Whereas, Plaintiffs were unable to meet the deadline set by the Court on March 9, 2020 (ECF No. 13) due to the unexpected pandemic and the effects of the same. 3. 6 Whereas, the parties agreed and the Court approved a 30-day extension to the 7 deadlines set by the Court on March 9, 2020. ECF Nos. 14 and 15. More specifically, Plaintiffs’ 8 amended complaint would be due April 29, 2020, while the parties’ joint discovery 9 plan/scheduling order or request for a stay of discovery would be due May 6, 2020. 4. 10 11 Whereas, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on April 30, 2020. ECF No. 18. Defendants’ response is due May 14, 2020. Fed R. Civ. P. 15 (a)(3). 5. 12 Whereas, due to unexpected scheduling conflicts, the parties agree to an additional 13 four (4) day extension of time through May 18 2020, for Defendants to respond to the second 14 amended complaint. ECF No. 18. 15 … 16 … 17 … 18 … 19 … 20 … 21 … 22 … 23 … 24 … 25 … 26 … 27 … 28 Page 2 of 3 Case 2:19-cv-00687-RFB-VCF Document 23 Filed 05/15/20 Page 3 of 3 1 6. Whereas, this is the first request for an extension regarding the filing of Defendants’ 2 response to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, which is made in good faith, not for the 3 purposes of delay, and neither party is prejudiced by the short extension. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DATED: May 14, 2020 DATED: May 14, 2020 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL JUSTICE FORCE LAW GOUP LLC By: /s/ Crystal J. Herrera Crystal J. Herrera (#12396) 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, NV, 89146 Attorney for the Defendants By: /s/ Zarinah J. Muhammad Zarinah J. Muhammad (#12830) 6278 Ruby Kinglet Las Vegas, NV, 89148 Attorney for the Plaintiffs ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5-15-2020 DATED: __________________________________ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?