U.S. Bank National Association v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company et al
Filing
57
ORDER Granting 55 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 53 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 4/9/2024. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Darren T. Brenner, Esq. (NBN 8386)
Christina V. Miller, Esq. (NBN 12448)
Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. (NBN 13474)
Yanxiong Li, Esq. (NBN 12807)
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
(702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345
dbrenner@wrightlegal.net
cmiller@wrightlegal.net
ldragon@wrightlegal.net
yli@wrightlegal.net
Attorney for Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, National Association, Successor Trustee To Bank Of America,
N.A., As Successor Trustee To LaSalle Bank, N.A, As Trustee For The Holders Of The First
Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-FF1
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF
AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR
TRUSTEE TO LASALLE BANK, N.A, AS
TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE
FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN
TRUST, MORTGAGE LOAN ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007FF1,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.: 2:19-cv-00809-GMN-BNW
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[ECF NO. 53]
(First Request)
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY and LAWYERS
TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION,
Defendants.
22
23
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, National Association, Successor Trustee To Bank
24
Of America, N.A., As Successor Trustee To LaSalle Bank, N.A, As Trustee For The Holders Of
25
The First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-
26
FF1 (“US Bank”) and Defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”,
27
collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsels, stipulate and
28
agree as follows:
Page 1 of 2
1
1. On March 12, 2024, Fidelity filed a Motion to Dismiss [ECF Nos. 53];
2
2. US Bank’s deadline to respond to Fidelity’s Motion to Dismiss is currently March 26,
3
2024;
4
3. This is one of five cases pending before this Court in which similar Motions to
5
Dismiss have been filed and with the same deadline for a response1. Good cause
6
exists for a brief extension as counsel for US Bank reasonably requires additional
7
time to diligently prepare responses given the numerous Motions to Dismiss due at
8
the same time. US Bank requests a two-week extension up to and including April 9,
9
2024 to file its response to Fidelity’s Motion to Dismiss;
10
4. Counsel for Fidelity does not oppose the requested extension;
11
5. This is the first request for an extension and is made in good faith and not for purposes
12
of undue delay or prejudice.
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
14
15
DATED this 25th day of March, 2024.
DATED this 25th day of March, 2024.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
SINCLAIR BRAUN KARGHER LLP
/s/ Yanxiong Li, Esq.
Yanxiong Li, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12807
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff
/s/ Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq.
Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12277
15260 Ventura Blvd., Ste 715
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
Attorneys for Defendant
16
17
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 26, 2024
DATED:___________
22
23
_________________________________
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
1
The other four cases being Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance
Company, Case No. 2:19-cv-00803-GMN-EJY; U.S. Bank National Association v. Fidelity
National Title Group, Inc., et al, Case No. 2:21-cv-01454-GMN-NJK; Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., et al, Case No. 2:20-cv-01886-GMNBNW; Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company,
Case No. 2:18-cv-02023-GMN-BNW.
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?