U.S. Bank National Association v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company et al

Filing 57

ORDER Granting 55 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 53 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 4/9/2024. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. (NBN 8386) Christina V. Miller, Esq. (NBN 12448) Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. (NBN 13474) Yanxiong Li, Esq. (NBN 12807) 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 (702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345 dbrenner@wrightlegal.net cmiller@wrightlegal.net ldragon@wrightlegal.net yli@wrightlegal.net Attorney for Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, National Association, Successor Trustee To Bank Of America, N.A., As Successor Trustee To LaSalle Bank, N.A, As Trustee For The Holders Of The First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-FF1 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO LASALLE BANK, N.A, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, MORTGAGE LOAN ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007FF1, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 2:19-cv-00809-GMN-BNW STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 53] (First Request) FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendants. 22 23 COMES NOW, Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, National Association, Successor Trustee To Bank 24 Of America, N.A., As Successor Trustee To LaSalle Bank, N.A, As Trustee For The Holders Of 25 The First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007- 26 FF1 (“US Bank”) and Defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”, 27 collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsels, stipulate and 28 agree as follows: Page 1 of 2 1 1. On March 12, 2024, Fidelity filed a Motion to Dismiss [ECF Nos. 53]; 2 2. US Bank’s deadline to respond to Fidelity’s Motion to Dismiss is currently March 26, 3 2024; 4 3. This is one of five cases pending before this Court in which similar Motions to 5 Dismiss have been filed and with the same deadline for a response1. Good cause 6 exists for a brief extension as counsel for US Bank reasonably requires additional 7 time to diligently prepare responses given the numerous Motions to Dismiss due at 8 the same time. US Bank requests a two-week extension up to and including April 9, 9 2024 to file its response to Fidelity’s Motion to Dismiss; 10 4. Counsel for Fidelity does not oppose the requested extension; 11 5. This is the first request for an extension and is made in good faith and not for purposes 12 of undue delay or prejudice. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 15 DATED this 25th day of March, 2024. DATED this 25th day of March, 2024. WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP SINCLAIR BRAUN KARGHER LLP /s/ Yanxiong Li, Esq. Yanxiong Li, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12807 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277 15260 Ventura Blvd., Ste 715 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Attorneys for Defendant 16 17 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. March 26, 2024 DATED:___________ 22 23 _________________________________ DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 1 The other four cases being Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Case No. 2:19-cv-00803-GMN-EJY; U.S. Bank National Association v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., et al, Case No. 2:21-cv-01454-GMN-NJK; Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., et al, Case No. 2:20-cv-01886-GMNBNW; Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Case No. 2:18-cv-02023-GMN-BNW. Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?