Briggs v. Saul

Filing 46

ORDER granting 45 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Reply to 44 Response to 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 11/13/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-01094-APG-NJK Document 46 Filed 10/15/20 Page 1 of 2 1 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 2 3 5 548 Market Street, Suite 38822 San Francisco California 94104-5401 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 6 /as 7 Attorney for Plaintiff 4 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 LAS VEGAS DIVISION 11 12 SHELENE IRENE BRIGGS, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 ANDREW M SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 17 18 Defendant ) Case No. 2:19-cv-01094-APG-NJK ) ) ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 20 Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until November 13, 2020, in which to e- 21 file her Reply to Defendants Response to Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is 22 necessitated due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s upcoming schedule of administrative hearings and 23 district court briefs due. Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly 24 delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection and has stipulated to the requested relief. 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER Case 2:19-cv-01094-APG-NJK Document 46 Filed 10/15/20 Page 2 of 2 1 Dated: October 14, 2020 /s/HARVEY P. SACKETT HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff SHELENE IRENE BRIGGS Dated: October 14, 2020 /s/ ALLISON J. CHEUNG ALLISON J. CHEUNG Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration [*As authorized by email 10/14/20] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS ORDERED. Dated: October 15, 2020 12 ______________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?