Briggs v. Saul
Filing
46
ORDER granting 45 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Reply to 44 Response to 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 11/13/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Case 2:19-cv-01094-APG-NJK Document 46 Filed 10/15/20 Page 1 of 2
1
HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488)
2
3
5
548 Market Street, Suite 38822
San Francisco California 94104-5401
Telephone: (408) 295-7755
Facsimile: (408) 295-7444
6
/as
7
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
LAS VEGAS DIVISION
11
12
SHELENE IRENE BRIGGS,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
16
ANDREW M SAUL,
Commissioner of Social Security,
17
18
Defendant
) Case No. 2:19-cv-01094-APG-NJK
)
)
) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
20
Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that
Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until November 13, 2020, in which to e-
21
file her Reply to Defendants Response to Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is
22
necessitated due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s upcoming schedule of administrative hearings and
23
district court briefs due. Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly
24
delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection and has stipulated to the requested relief.
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Case 2:19-cv-01094-APG-NJK Document 46 Filed 10/15/20 Page 2 of 2
1
Dated: October 14, 2020
/s/HARVEY P. SACKETT
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
SHELENE IRENE BRIGGS
Dated: October 14, 2020
/s/ ALLISON J. CHEUNG
ALLISON J. CHEUNG
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration
[*As authorized by email 10/14/20]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS ORDERED.
Dated: October 15, 2020
12
______________________________
ANDREW P. GORDON
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?