Ramirez v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

Filing 177

ORDER Granting 176 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 174 Motion for Remittitur and 175 Motion for Sanctions. Responses due by 12/17/2024. Replies due by 1/15/2025. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/25/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Christian Gabroy (#8805) Kaine Messer (#14240) Gabroy | Messer The District at Green Valley Ranch 170 South Green Valley Parkway Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 Tel: (702) 259-7777 Fax: (702) 259-7704 christian@gabroy.com kmesser@gabroy.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Tiare Ramirez 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 GABROY | MESSER 170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 (702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704 11 TIARE RAMIREZ, an individual; Case No. 2:19-cv-01174-APG-EJY Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE vs. 13 14 WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC; DOES I through X; and ROE Corporations XI through XX inclusive, 15 Defendant. (1) TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REMITTITUR ECF NO. 174 AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS ECF NO. 175 16 AND 17 18 (2) TO FILE DEFENDANT’S REPLY THERETO 19 (First Request) 20 21 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE (1) TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REMITTITUR ECF NO. 174 AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS ECF NO. 175 AND (2) TO FILE DEFENDANT’S REPLY THERETO 23 The Parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby 24 stipulate that Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Remittitur (ECF No. 25 174) and Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 175) (together Defendant’s “Motion”) 26 shall be extended fourteen (14) days to December 17, 2024. Defendant’s Motion 27 was filed on November 17, 2024 and Plaintiff’s Opposition is currently due on 28 December 3, 2024. See LR 7-2(b). Additionally, the parties further agree that Page 1 of 3 GABROY | MESSER 170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 (702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704 1 Defendant’s Reply thereto shall be due no later than January 15, 2025. This is the 2 parties’ first request for an extension of these deadlines. 3 Good cause supports this request. Lead counsel for Plaintiff had a recent 4 death in the family requiring his attention. Plaintiff’s counsel has additional staffing 5 issues necessitating the extension. The parties further believe good cause exists 6 for Defendant’s reply to be due by January 15, 2025, as the extended deadline for 7 the opposition would otherwise require Defendant’s reply to be due in the midst of 8 the holidays conflicting with planned travel and time away from the office. 9 Therefore, Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motions, ECF 174 and 10 175, shall be due no later than Tuesday, December 17, 2024 and Defendant’s 11 Reply thereto shall be due no later than Wednesday, January 15, 2025. 12 /// 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 This stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay. No party is prejudiced by this stipulation. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 Dated: November 22, 2024 Dated: November 22, 2024 5 Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, /s/ Christian Gabroy Christian Gabroy (#8805) Kaine Messer (#14240) The District at Green Valley Ranch 170 South Green Valley Parkway Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 Tel: (702) 259-7777 christian@gabroy.com kmesser@gabroy.com /s/ Wendy M. Krincek Patrick H. Hicks, Esq. (#4632) Wendy M. Krincek (#6147) Kelsey E. Stegall (#14279) 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel: (702) 862-8800 phicks@littler.com wkrincek@littler.com kstegall@littler.com 6 7 8 9 10 GABROY | MESSER 170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 (702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff Tiara Ramirez Attorneys for Defendant Wynn Las Vegas, LLC 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 22 _________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 25, 2024 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?