Ramirez v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
Filing
177
ORDER Granting 176 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 174 Motion for Remittitur and 175 Motion for Sanctions. Responses due by 12/17/2024. Replies due by 1/15/2025. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/25/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Christian Gabroy
(#8805)
Kaine Messer
(#14240)
Gabroy | Messer
The District at Green Valley Ranch
170 South Green Valley Parkway
Suite 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
Tel: (702) 259-7777
Fax: (702) 259-7704
christian@gabroy.com
kmesser@gabroy.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Tiare Ramirez
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
GABROY | MESSER
170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
(702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704
11
TIARE RAMIREZ, an individual;
Case No. 2:19-cv-01174-APG-EJY
Plaintiff,
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE
vs.
13
14
WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC; DOES I
through X; and ROE Corporations XI
through XX inclusive,
15
Defendant.
(1) TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR REMITTITUR ECF
NO. 174 AND MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS ECF NO. 175
16
AND
17
18
(2) TO FILE DEFENDANT’S
REPLY THERETO
19
(First Request)
20
21
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE (1) TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REMITTITUR ECF NO. 174
AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS ECF NO. 175 AND (2) TO FILE
DEFENDANT’S REPLY THERETO
23
The Parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby
24
stipulate that Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Remittitur (ECF No.
25
174) and Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 175) (together Defendant’s “Motion”)
26
shall be extended fourteen (14) days to December 17, 2024. Defendant’s Motion
27
was filed on November 17, 2024 and Plaintiff’s Opposition is currently due on
28
December 3, 2024. See LR 7-2(b). Additionally, the parties further agree that
Page 1 of 3
GABROY | MESSER
170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
(702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704
1
Defendant’s Reply thereto shall be due no later than January 15, 2025. This is the
2
parties’ first request for an extension of these deadlines.
3
Good cause supports this request. Lead counsel for Plaintiff had a recent
4
death in the family requiring his attention. Plaintiff’s counsel has additional staffing
5
issues necessitating the extension. The parties further believe good cause exists
6
for Defendant’s reply to be due by January 15, 2025, as the extended deadline for
7
the opposition would otherwise require Defendant’s reply to be due in the midst of
8
the holidays conflicting with planned travel and time away from the office.
9
Therefore, Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motions, ECF 174 and
10
175, shall be due no later than Tuesday, December 17, 2024 and Defendant’s
11
Reply thereto shall be due no later than Wednesday, January 15, 2025.
12
///
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
This stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay. No
party is prejudiced by this stipulation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
Dated: November 22, 2024
Dated: November 22, 2024
5
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Christian Gabroy
Christian Gabroy
(#8805)
Kaine Messer
(#14240)
The District at Green Valley Ranch
170 South Green Valley Parkway
Suite 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
Tel: (702) 259-7777
christian@gabroy.com
kmesser@gabroy.com
/s/ Wendy M. Krincek
Patrick H. Hicks, Esq.
(#4632)
Wendy M. Krincek
(#6147)
Kelsey E. Stegall
(#14279)
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Tel: (702) 862-8800
phicks@littler.com
wkrincek@littler.com
kstegall@littler.com
6
7
8
9
10
GABROY | MESSER
170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
(702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Tiara Ramirez
Attorneys for Defendant
Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
22
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 25, 2024
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?