Ramirez v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

Filing 40

ORDER granting 39 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 3/8/2021. Motions due by 4/7/2021. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 11/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-01174-APG-DJA Document 39 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 4 40 11/17/20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WENDY MEDURA KRINCEK, ESQ., Bar # 6417 KELSEY E. STEGALL, ESQ., Bar #14279 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 Email: wkrincek@littler.com Email: kstegall@littler.com Attorneys for Defendant WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 TIARE RAMIREZ, an individual;, 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:19-cv-01174-APG-DJA 14 vs. 15 16 WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC; DOES I through X; and ROE Corporations XI through XX, inclusive;, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES 17 Defendant. 18 (Fourth Request) 19 26-3 Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 26-4, Defendant WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC. 20 (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff TIARE RAMIREZ (“Plaintiff”), by and through their undersigned 21 counsel, hereby stipulate to amend the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, (ECF No. 38), by 22 extending the outstanding discovery deadlines for a period of ninety (90) days. 23 This is the fourth request for an extension to the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order in this 24 matter. The requested extension is sought in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay. This 25 request is submitted at least twenty-one (21) days or more before each deadline set forth below. 26 DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE 27 Both parties have exchanged their initial disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 28 26(a)(1)(A). Plaintiff served her initial disclosures on September 9, 2019 and her first supplemental L I T T L ER ME N DE LS ON, P.C . A t t o r n e y s A t L aw 3 9 6 0 H o w a r d H u g h e s Pa r k wa y S ui te 300 L a s V e g a s , N V 8 9 1 6 9 - 59 3 7 702.862.8800 Case 2:19-cv-01174-APG-DJA Document 39 Filed 11/16/20 Page 2 of 4 40 11/17/20 1 disclosures on November 1, 2019. Defendant served its initial disclosures on September 10, 2019 and 2 its first supplemental disclosures on November 1, 2019. Defendant responded to Plaintiff’s first sets 3 of interrogatories and requests for production of documents on November 1, 2019. Plaintiff responded 4 to Defendant’s first sets of interrogatories and requests for production of documents on November 1, 5 2019. 6 On December 6, 2019, Defendant issued third-party subpoenas for Plaintiff’s employment, 7 education and medical records. Plaintiff objected to and moved to quash the subpoenas for Plaintiff’s 8 employment and education records (ECF No. 23). Defendant withdrew the subpoenas for Plaintiff’s 9 education records but maintained its request for Plaintiff’s employment records from Caesars Palace 10 and Able Baker Brewing. The parties fully briefed the issue regarding the discoverability of Plaintiff’s 11 employment records and on January 31, 2020, Magistrate Judge Albregts granted in part and denied 12 in part Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas (ECF No. 26). Plaintiff subsequently filed 13 Objections to Magistrate Judge Albregts’ Order, which District Judge Gordon affirmed by Order dated 14 March 3, 2020 (ECF No. 32). Thereafter, Defendant issued amended subpoenas to Caesars Palace and 15 Able Baker Brewing for Plaintiff’s employment records in accordance with District Judge Gordon’s 16 Order. Defendant received a response to its subpoena from Caesars Palace timely but Able Baker 17 Brewing and treating healthcare provider, D. Ted Cohen responded to the respective subpoenas late. 18 DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED 19 Plaintiff anticipates taking the deposition of Defendant Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, pursuant to 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6). Plaintiff also anticipates taking the depositions of 21 individuals with knowledge of the facts and circumstances surrounding the allegations in the 22 Complaint. Such individuals are anticipated to include Jeralynn Makaiwi, Karen Sanchez, Melissa 23 Espino-Cascos, and Tia Gibson. 24 Defendant anticipates taking the deposition of Plaintiff Tiare Ramirez and perhaps others based 25 upon the deposition testimony provided. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// L I T T L ER ME N DE LS ON, P.C . A t t o r n e y s A t L aw 3 9 6 0 H o w a r d H u g h e s Pa r k wa y S ui te 300 L a s V e g a s , N V 8 9 1 6 9 - 59 3 7 702.862.8800 2. Case 2:19-cv-01174-APG-DJA Document 39 Filed 11/16/20 Page 3 of 4 40 11/17/20 REASONS FOR EXTENSION TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY 1 2 This extension is necessary and good cause exists for several reasons. The current pandemic 3 caused delays and difficulties in completing discovery due to employee furloughs and business 4 closures (including delayed subpoena responses). In addition, a household member of counsel for 5 Defendant suffering from a chronic health condition suffered a serious decline and recently was 6 transitioned to a long-term care facility, which caused unpredictability in availability for depositions. 7 Counsel for Plaintiff has also had personal commitments that have delayed such discovery 8 including Plaintiff Counsel’s father being in ICU for over thirty days, transferred to IMU, and now in 9 a skilled nursing facility. Plaintiff Counsel is assisting his father in his pending legal matters as well. 10 PROPOSED REVISED DISCOVERY PLAN 11 1. 12 The discovery cut-off deadline shall be extended for ninety (90) days from December 7, 2020 13 Discovery Cut-Off Deadline to Monday, March 8, 2021. 14 2. 15 The parties shall file dispositive motions thirty (30) days after the extended discovery cut-off 16 Dispositive Motions Deadline date of March 8, 2021, and therefore, not later than Wednesday, April 7, 2021. 17 3. Joint Pretrial Order Deadline 18 If no dispositive motions are filed, and unless otherwise ordered by this Court, the Joint Pretrial 19 Order shall be filed thirty (30) days after the date set for filing dispositive motions, and therefore, not 20 later than Friday, May 7, 2021. In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the Joint 21 Pretrial Order shall be suspended until thirty (30) days after the Court enters a ruling on the dispositive 22 motions or otherwise by further order of the Court. 23 4. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) Disclosures 24 The pre-trial disclosures deadline shall be extended for ninety (90) days from February 4, 2021 25 to Wednesday, May 5, 2021. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// L I T T L ER ME N DE LS ON, P.C . A t t o r n e y s A t L aw 3 9 6 0 H o w a r d H u g h e s Pa r k wa y S ui te 300 L a s V e g a s , N V 8 9 1 6 9 - 59 3 7 702.862.8800 3. Case 2:19-cv-01174-APG-DJA Document 39 Filed 11/16/20 Page 4 of 4 40 11/17/20 1 5. Extensions or Modification of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order 2 In accordance with Local Rule 26-4, any stipulation or motion for modification or extension 3 of this discovery plan and scheduling order must be made at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the 4 expiration of the subject deadline. 26-3 5 6. 6 No trial has been set in this matter. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Trial and Calendar Call Dated: November 16, 2020 Dated: November 16, 2020 Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, /s/ Christian Gabroy, Esq. CHRISTIAN GABROY, ESQ. GABROY LAW OFFICES /s/ Wendy M. Krincek, Esq. WENDY KRINCEK, ESQ. KELSEY STEGALL, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff TIARE RAMIREZ 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC Because the parties have stipulated to an extension of the discovery deadline, and for good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the foregoing Stipulation. 19 20 November 17 Dated: _____________________, 2020 21 22 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 4829-5394-3250.1 067538.1036 26 27 28 L I T T L ER ME N DE LS ON, P.C . A t t o r n e y s A t L aw 3 9 6 0 H o w a r d H u g h e s Pa r k wa y S ui te 300 L a s V e g a s , N V 8 9 1 6 9 - 59 3 7 702.862.8800 4.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?