Reese et al v. Great West Casualty Company et al

Filing 7

ORDER Granting 1 Motion to Quash FRCP 30(b)(6) Deposition Subpoena, to Quash or Modify the Deposition Production Requests, and for a Protective Order under FRCP 26(c). See Order for specifications. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for a protective order is not decided by the Court as it is rendered moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 9/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

WILBERT REESE AND MARCO ODDS,

5

Plaintiffs,

6
7
8

Case No. 2:19-CV-01468-GMN-EJY
ORDER

v.
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY,
MILLER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,
INC., and LEROY CALDWELL,

9

Defendant.

10
11

Before the Court is the Motion to Quash FRCP 30(b)(6) Deposition Subpoena, to Quash or

12

Modify the Deposition Production Request, and for a Protective Order under FRCP 26(c) filed by

13

Non-Parties Medport LA, LLC (“Medport LA”) and Medport Billing, LLC (“Medport Billing”). 1

14

ECF No. 1. Medport’s Motion was filed on August 22, 2019. As of the date of this Order no

15

response to Medport’s Motion has been filed by any of the parties to this dispute.

16

United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Local Rule 7-2(d) states: “The failure

17

of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under

18

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.”

19

Accordingly,

20

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ECF No. 1, Non-Parties Medport LA, LLC and Medport

21

Billing, LLC’s Motion to Quash FRCP 30(b)(6) Deposition Subpoena, to Quash or Modify the

22

Deposition Production Requests, and for a Protective Order under FRCP 26(c), is GRANTED as

23

follows: The Subpoena to Testify in a Civil Action issued to Medport LA, LLC and/or Medport

24

Billing, LLC, together with documents to be produced pursuant to Exhibit A to the Subpoena, issued

25

collectively by Defendants is quashed.

26
27
28

1

Medport LA and Medport Billing are collectively referred to herein as “Medport.”

1

1
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for a protective order is not decided by the
Court as it is rendered moot.

3
4

DATED: September 18, 2019

5
6
7
8

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2