Greene v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 101

ORDER Granting 99 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Discovery due by 6/28/2024. Motions due by 7/29/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/29/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AARON D. FORD Attorney General Sabrena K. Clinton (Bar No. 6499) Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 486-3420 (phone) (702) 486-3773 (fax) sclinton@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Renee Baker and E.K. McDaniel 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 DELBERT M. GREENE, 12 Case No. 2:19-cv-01529-APG-MDC Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 15 JOINT SITPUATION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES (SECOND REQUEST) Defendants. 16 17 Defendants Renee Baker and E.K. McDaniel and Plaintiff Delbert Greene, by and 18 through their respective counsel, submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend all 19 Deadlines by an additional thirty (30) days. This is the second request to extend deadlines 20 in this matter. The Parties have agreed to the extension for the reasons set forth below. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 21 22 Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint in this case on July 15, 2020. (ECF No. 11.) 23 Despite lack of service, Defendants Renee Baker and E.K. McDaniel filed their Motion to 24 Dismiss on July 28, 2021 (ECF No. 37). On March 31, 2022, the Court denied the Motion 25 to Dismiss ordering the Plaintiff to show cause why his claims should be equitably tolled 26 and providing Defendants Baker and McDaniel with an opportunity to respond (ECF No. 27 45). 28 dismiss (ECF No. 37) and Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 48) 30 Page 1 of 4 31 On October 24, 2022, the Court denied Defendant Baker and McDaniel’s motion to 1 but granted Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 61). ECF No. 63. The 2 Court referred the matter to the pro bono program on October 24, 2022 (ECF No. 64). 3 Defendants Baker and McDaniel filed an Answer to the First Amended Complaint on 4 March 28, 2023. (ECF No. 75.) On April 28, 2023, the Court issued an order to extend case 5 management deadlines so as to allow time for pro bono counsel to be appointed for Plaintiff. 6 (ECF No. 83.) Pro bono counsel entered an appearance on behalf of Plaintiff on June 2, 7 2023. (ECF No. 84.) 8 On July 31, 2023, the Court entered an order granting a Joint Request to Extend all 9 Deadlines (First Request) (ECF No. 87). Since that time, the parties participated in a Rule 10 26 Conference and made Initial Disclosures. A Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order was 11 issued on January 2, 2024 (ECF No. 91). In November 2023, Defendants served Plaintiff 12 with interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions. 13 Defendants served Subpoenas Duces Tecum on healthcare providers requesting medical 14 records relating to Plaintiff. In January and February, 2024, Plaintiff made First and 15 Second Supplemental Disclosures and served Subpoenas Duces Tecum on non-parties 16 Nevada Department of Corrections and the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners. The 17 Parties also have held several meet-and-confers and have been able to resolve conflicts 18 without court intervention to date. 19 GOOD CAUSE TO EXTEND DISCOVERY 20 Both parties are actively engaging in discovery and will continue to do so to ensure 21 that relevant information is obtained and exchanged in a timely manner. Because Plaintiff 22 is currently in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections, Defendants will be 23 filing motions for permission to conduct an IME and to take his deposition. Defendants 24 believe the IME and the deposition will provide information necessary for expert 25 disclosures. 26 The Parties have stipulated and agreed to extend all deadlines by an additional 27 thirty (30) days as set forth below. This extension will ensure that the case continues to 28 progress smoothly, and to allow both sides to address issues that may arise between them. 30 Page 2 of 4 31 1 For these reasons, this stipulation is made for good cause and not for any improper motive 2 or to cause unnecessary delay. 3 4 The Parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following proposed deadlines in this case: 5 Event Existing Deadline 6 Proposed New Deadline 7 Last day to Amend Pleadings 8 Expert Disclosures (for party April 2, 2024 9 with the burden of proof on the April 30, 2024 May 30, 2024 May 2, 2024 10 issue) 11 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures May 1, 2024 May 31, 2024 12 Discovery Cutoff May 29, 2024 June 28, 2024 Discovery Motion Deadline June 15, 2024 July 15, 2024 Dispositive Motion Deadline June 29, 2024 July 29, 2024 Joint Proposed Pretrial Order July 30, 2024 August 29, 2024 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 30 31 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 If dispositive motions are filed, the deadline for filing the joint pretrial order will be suspended until 30 days after decision on the dispositive motions or further court order. IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. DATED this 22nd day of March, 2024. DATED this 22nd day of March, 2024. 5 6 DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC AARON D. FORD Attorney General /s/John L. Krieger John L. Krieger, Esq. Email: jkrieger@dickinson-wright.com 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 800 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 /s/Sabrena K. Clinton Sabrena K. Clinton, Esq. Email: sclinton@ag.nv.gov 555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Renee Baker and McDaniel 7 8 9 10 11 12 E.K. 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Parties are reminded to use the correct case number in all future filings: 2:19-cv-01529-APG-MDC 18 19 20 21 22 Maximiliano D. Couvillier III United States Magistrate Judge 23 DATED: March 26, 2024 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?