Universal Entertainment Corporation v. Aruze Gaming America, Inc. et al
Filing
112
ORDER Granting 110 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Benjamin B. Klubes withdrawn from the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/9/2022. Attorney Benjamin B. Klubes terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
Case 2:19-cv-01657-RFB-NJK Document 110 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 6
112
05/09/22
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
David S. Krakoff (pro hac vice)
Benjamin B. Klubes (pro hac vice)
Lauren R. Randell (pro hac vice)
Adam Miller (pro hac vice)
BUCKLEY LLP
2001 M Street NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 349-8000
Facsimile: (202) 349-8080
Email: dkrakoff@buckleyfirm.com
Email: bklubes@buckleyfirm.com
Email: lrandell@buckleyfirm.com
Email: amiller@buckleyfirm.com
Jay J. Schuttert, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 8656)
David W. Gutke, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 9820)
EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP
6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Telephone: (702) 805-0290
Facsimile: (702) 805-0291
Email: jschuttert@efstriallaw.com
Email: dgutke@efstriallaw.com
Bruce R. Genderson (pro hac vice)
David M. Krinsky (pro hac vice)
Adam D. Harber (pro hac vice)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
680 Maine Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20024
Telephone: (202) 434-5000
Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
Email: bgenderson@wc.com
Email: dkrinsky@wc.com
Email: aharber@wc.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT
CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation,
16
17
18
19
Case No.: 2:19-CV-01657 (RFB)(NJK)
Plaintiff,
PLAINTIFF UNIVERSAL
ENTERTAINMENT
CORPORATION’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO WITHDRAW
BENJAMIN KLUBES AS COUNSEL
OF RECORD AND MEMORANDUM
OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
SUPPORT
vs.
ARUZE GAMING AMERICA, INC., a Nevada
corporation, KAZUO OKADA, an individual,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff Universal Entertainment Corporation, by and through its undersigned counsel,
respectfully requests, pursuant to Local Rules IA 11-6 and 6-2, leave of the Court to withdraw
Benjamin B. Klubes as counsel of record.
Counsel for Defendants Aruze Gaming America, Inc., and Kazuo Okada have indicated that
they do not oppose this motion.
26
27
28
1
Case 2:19-cv-01657-RFB-NJK Document 110 Filed 05/06/22 Page 2 of 6
112
05/09/22
4
1
Dated: May 6, 2022
Respectfully submitted,
2
By: /s/ Jay J. Schuttert
Jay J. Schuttert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8656
David W. Gutke, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9820
EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP
6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
3
4
5
6
David S. Krakoff (pro hac vice)
Benjamin B. Klubes (pro hac vice)
Lauren R. Randell (pro hac vice)
Adam Miller (pro hac vice)
BUCKLEY LLP
2001 M Street NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036
7
8
9
10
13
Bruce R. Genderson (pro hac vice)
David M. Krinsky (pro hac vice)
Adam D. Harber (pro hac vice)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
680 Maine Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20024
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11
12
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case 2:19-cv-01657-RFB-NJK Document 110 Filed 05/06/22 Page 3 of 6
112
05/09/22
4
1
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
2
Local Rule IA 11-6(b) states that: “ If an attorney seeks to withdraw after appearing in a case,
3
the attorney must file a motion or stipulation and serve it on the affected client and opposing counsel.”
4
Benjamin B. Klubes, who has appeared in this action, will no longer be associated with Buckley LLP,
5
one of the firms representing Universal Entertainment Corporation in this action, after May 6, 2022,
6
and Universal Entertainment Corporation accordingly seeks to withdraw Mr. Klubes as counsel of
7
record.
8
All parties in this case have received notice of the instant motion and will additionally receive
9
notice of this motion through the CM/ECF system. Counsel for Defendants Aruze Gaming America,
10
Inc., and Kazuo Okada have indicated that they do not oppose this motion.
11
Additionally, pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-6(d), withdrawal will not cause any delay in the
12
instant proceedings as Universal Entertainment Corporation will continue to be represented in this
13
action by attorneys Jay J. Schuttert and David Gutke of Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP, David S.
14
Krakoff, Lauren R. Randell, and Adam Miller of Buckley LLP, and Bruce R. Genderson, David M.
15
Krinsky, and Adam D. Harber of Williams & Connolly LLP.
16
17
Additionally, movant has attached a proposed order and the LR IA 6-2 signature block,
whichever the Court chooses to use.
18
19
Dated: May 6, 2022
20
By: /s/ Jay J. Schuttert
Jay J. Schuttert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8656
David W. Gutke, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9820
EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP
6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Telephone: (702) 805-0290
Facsimile: (702) 805-0291
Email: jschuttert@efstriallaw.com
Email: dgutke@efstriallaw.com
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 9, 2022
.
.
___________________________
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge
David S. Krakoff (pro hac vice)
Benjamin B. Klubes (pro hac vice)
Lauren R. Randell (pro hac vice)
3
Case 2:19-cv-01657-RFB-NJK Document 110 Filed 05/06/22 Page 4 of 6
112
05/09/22
4
Adam Miller (pro hac vice)
BUCKLEY LLP
2001 M Street NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 349-8000
Facsimile: (202) 349-8080
Email: dkrakoff@buckleyfirm.com
Email: bklubes@buckleyfirm.com
Email: lrandell@buckleyfirm.com
Email: amiller@buckleyfirm.com
Email: vviswanatha@buckleyfirm.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
Bruce R. Genderson (pro hac vice)
David M. Krinsky (pro hac vice)
Adam D. Harber (pro hac vice)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
680 Maine Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20024
Telephone: (202) 434-5000
Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
Email: bgenderson@wc.com
Email: dkrinsky@wc.com
Email: aharber@wc.com
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED:
16
_____________________________________
17
HON. NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
DATED: _______________
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?