Czudar v. Pro-Vigil, Inc.

Filing 36

ORDER denying 35 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-01784-GMN-NJK Document 36 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 JULIUS CZUDAR, 9 10 Case No.: 2:19-cv-01784-GMN-NJK Plaintiff(s), 8 ORDER v. [Docket No. 35] PRO-VIGIL, INC. 11 12 Defendant(s). Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend discovery deadlines. Docket 13 No. 35. A request to extend deadlines in the Court’s scheduling order must be supported by a 14 showing of good cause for the extension. Local Rule 26-3; see also Johnson v. Mammoth 15 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d at 608–09. 1 A request to extend deadlines must also provide “[a] 16 specific description of the discovery that remains to be completed.” Local Rule 26-3(b). 17 Here, the parties fail to provide a specific description of the discovery that remains to be 18 completed. See Docket No. 35 at 3. Further, the stipulation requests a 90-day extension in some 19 sections and a 120-day extension in others. Compare id. at 1, 2, with id. at 3. 20 Accordingly, the Court DENIES the parties’ stipulation without prejudice. Docket No. 21 35. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: November 19, 2020 24 ______________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 1 The “good cause” standard in Local Rule 26-3 is the same as the standard governing 28 modification of the scheduling order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?