SATA GmbH & Co. KG v. Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd
Filing
12
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 11 ), is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, (ECF No. 8 ), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that default judgme nt be entered in favor of Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG and against Defendant Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd be permanently enjoined from using in commerc e any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation likely to cause confusion of a product that infringes on any of the trademarks and/or patents of Plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $10,000,000 in statu tory damages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $7,153 in attorneys' fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $742.10 in costs. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
Case 2:19-cv-01948-GMN-BNW Document 12 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 3
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SATA GmbH & Co. KG,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
TAIZHOU XINGYE PNEUMATIC TOOLS )
CO., LTD,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01948-GMN-BNW
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
11
Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, (ECF No. 11), which recommends granting Plaintiff’s
12
Motion for Default Judgment, (ECF No. 8).
13
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a
14
United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);
15
D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo
16
determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,
17
or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.
18
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is
19
not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an
20
objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized
21
that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
22
where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
23
1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
24
25
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so, February 10, 2021, has passed.
(See Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 11).
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:19-cv-01948-GMN-BNW Document 12 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 3
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 11), is
3
4
5
ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, (ECF No.
8), is GRANTED.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that default judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff
7
SATA GmbH & Co. KG and against Defendant Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd.
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co.,
Ltd and its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all others who are in active
10
concert or participation with the aforementioned be permanently enjoined from using in
11
commerce (including through manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, distributing, promoting,
12
advertising, and/or displaying) any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation likely
13
to cause confusion of a product that infringes on any of the following trademarks and/or patents
14
of Plaintiff’s:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,153,260;
2. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,072,417;
3. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,770,801;
4. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,774,593;
5. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,793,583;
6. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,920,510 (“1000”);
7. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,920,511 (“2000”);
8. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,920,512 (“3000”);
9. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,666,773 (“4000”);
10. U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,591,111 (“RP”);
11. U.S. D644,716 (“’716 Patent”);
12. U.S. D548,816 (“’816 Patent”);
13. U.S. D552,715 (“’715 Patent”); and
14. U.S. D552,213 (“’213 Patent”).
24
25
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:19-cv-01948-GMN-BNW Document 12 Filed 02/16/21 Page 3 of 3
1
Defendant Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd.’s products that infringe these trademarks
2
and/or patents include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following models:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1. M-1000G
2. M-808
3. M-4000G
4. M-3000P
5. MINI 3000P
6. H-2000
7. M-3000G
8. M-2000G
9. AB-17G
10. R-3100
11. An unnamed model number on MingFar’s website that infringes U.S. Design Patent
D552,715 for SATAjet 3000 B.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $10,000,000 in statutory
damages.
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $7,153 in attorneys’ fees.
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $742.10 in costs.
15
16
DATED this _____ day of February, 2021.
16
17
18
19
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?