SATA GmbH & Co. KG v. Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd

Filing 13

DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of SATA GmbH & Co. KG against Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 2/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-01948-GMN-BNW Document 13 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1 AO450 (NVD Rev. 2/18) Judgment in a Civil Case UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SATA GmbH & Co. KG, DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Plaintiff, 19cv1948 Case Number: 2:19-cv-01948-GMN-BNW v. Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd., Defendant. Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. Decision by Court. This action came for consideration before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that default judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG and against Defendant Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Taizhou Xingye Pneumatic Tools Co., Ltd. be permanently enjoined from using in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation likely to cause confusion of a product that infringes on any of the trademarks and/or patents of Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $10,000,000 in statutory damages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $7,153 in attorneys' fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff $742.10 in costs. 2/17/2021 2/16/2021 ___________________ DEBRA K. KEMPI Date Clerk /s/ H. Magennis /s/ D. Reich-Smith Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?