Whittemore v. Anderson Financial Services, LLC et al

Filing 101

ORDER Granting 100 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 92 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 6/8/2021. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/3/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

PHILIP J. TRENCHAK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9924
MULLINS & TRENCHAK, ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1614 S. Maryland Pkwy
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
-ANDJENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9017
E-mail: [e-mail]
HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP
1785 East Sahara, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

15
16
17

KATELYN WHITTEMORE, an
individual,

CASE NO.: 2:19-cv-01951-GMN-EJY

Plaintiff,

18
19

vs.

20

ANDREW “TOBY” MATHIS, an
individual, CLINT COONS, an individual,
MICHAEL BOWMAN, an individual,
RAYMOND “KENNER” FRENCH, an
individual, VAST HOLDINGS GROUP,
LLC, doing business as a Nevada limitedliability company; ANDERSON
FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, doing
business as a foreign Washington limitedliability company; VAST SOLUTIONS
GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation,
VAST FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC., a
Nevada Domestic Corporation;

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’/
COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ RESPONSE IN
OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S/COUNTERDEFENDANT’S ANTI-SLAPP SPECIAL
MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO
NRS 41.637

28
Page 1 of 4

(FIRST REQUEST)

1
2
3
4

GRAPHENE ADVISORS LLC, a Nevada
Limited Liability Company, VAST
SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, a
Washington Limited Liability Company;
and Anderson Investment Consultants,
LLC; DOES 1-100, inclusive.

5

Defendants.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

VAST HOLDING GROUP, LLC, a
Nevada
limited liability company, VAST
SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC., a Nevada
Corporation, GRAPHENE ADVISORS
LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company,
VAST SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, A
Washington Limited Liability Company,
RAYMOND “KENNER” FRENCH, an
individual,

13

Counterclaimants,

14

v.

15

KATELYN WHITTEMORE, an individual,
and DOES I-X, and ROE
CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Counter-Defendants.
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

KATELYN

WHITTEMORE

(“Plaintiff”)

and

Defendants/Counterclaimants VAST HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC, VAST SOLUTIONS
GROUP, INC., VAST SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, VAST FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,

23

GRAPHENE ADVISORS, LLC, ANDERSON INVESTMENT CONSULTANTS, LLC AND

24

R. KENNER FRENCH (“Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate

25

to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to reply to Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s

26
27
28

Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Dismiss pursuant to NRS 41.637 (ECF 99), which was filed on
May 11, 2021. The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
Page 2 of 4

1
2

1.

Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Anti-SLAPP

Special Motion to Dismiss pursuant to NRS 41.637 (ECF 99) is currently due on May 18, 2021.

3

2.

In order to avoid unnecessary time and expense in connection with motions to

4

dismiss and other litigation matters pertaining to Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s

5

Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Dismiss pursuant to NRS 41.637 (ECF 99), Plaintiff and

6

Defendants have agreed to extend the time by which Plaintiff shall be required to reply to

7

Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Dismiss

8

pursuant to NRS 41.637 (ECF 99) by a period of two (2) weeks.

9

3.

Pursuant to this agreement between the parties, Plaintiff shall be required to file a

10

reply to Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Dismiss

11

pursuant to NRS 41.637 (ECF 99) or before June 8, 2021.

12

4.

The parties agree that good cause exists for the request for the extension of the

13

deadline for a reply to Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Anti-SLAPP Special

14

Motion to Dismiss pursuant to NRS 41.637 (ECF 99) for the above-specified reasons.

15
16

///

17
18

///

19
20

///

21
22

///

23
24

///

25
26

///

27
28

///
Page 3 of 4

1
2

5.

The parties agree that the requested extension is warranted under the current

circumstances and will not result in an undue or significant delay in the administration of this case.

3

Dated this 26th day of May, 2021.

Dated this 26th day of May, 2021.

4

HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS
LLP

HOLLEY DRIGGS

/s/ Jenny L Foley
Jenny L. Foley, Ph.D., Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9017
1785 East Sahara Ave., Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104

/s/ Kristol Bradley Ginapp
Kristol Bradley Ginapp, Esq.
400 South Fourth Street, 3rd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Philip J. Trenchak, Esq.
Victoria C. Mullins, Esq.
MULLINS & TRENCHAK,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1614 S. Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89104

Attorneys for Defendants
Vast Holdings Group, LLC,
Vast Solutions Group, Inc.,
Vast Solutions Group, LLC,
Vast Financial Solutions, Inc.,
Graphene Advisors, LLC, and
R. Kenner French

Attorneys for Plaintiff

15

ORDER

16

IT IS SO ORDERED nunc pro tunc.

17

3
Dated this __ day of May, 2021.

June

18
19
20
21
22

Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
United States District Court

23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 4 of 4