Lavoll v. Howell et al
Filing
46
ORDER Granting 44 Motion to Reopen Case. It is further ordered that, as the stay is lifted by this order, the Clerk of Court is directed to REOPEN THE FILE in this action. It is further ordered that Respondents have 45 days from the date of this order to file a response to the Petition. It is further ordered that Petitioner has 30 days following service of Respondents' response to file his response. Jerry Howell answer re 17 First Amended Petition due 6/7/2024; Nevada Attorney General re 17 First Amended Petition answer due 6/7/2024. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/23/2024. Case reopened. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8 TERRANCE L. LAVOLL,
9
Petitioner
10 v.
Case No.: 2:19-cv-02249-GMN-EJY
Order Granting Motion to Reopen Case
(ECF No. 44)
11 JERRY HOWELL, et al.,
12
13
Respondents.
In October 2022, this Court granted a stay and administratively closed Terrance
14 L. Lavoll’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Habeas Corpus Petition. (ECF No. 43.) Lavoll’s further
15 state-court proceedings have concluded, and he has now returned to this Court seeking
16 to reopen this case. (ECF No. 44.) Respondents indicate that they do not oppose the
17 Motion. (ECF No. 45). Good cause appearing, this action is reopened.
18
It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 44) is
19 GRANTED.
20
21
22
23
1
It is further ordered that, as the stay is lifted by this order, the Clerk of Court is
2 directed to REOPEN THE FILE in this action.
3
It is further ordered that Respondents have 45 days from the date of this order to
4 file a response to the Petition.
5
It is further ordered that Petitioner has 30 days following service of Respondents’
6 response to file his response.
7
8
9
DATED: 23 April 2024.
10
11
GLORIA M. NAVARRO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?