Reflex Media, Inc. et al v. Richard Easton Limited et al

Filing 53

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 51 Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 33 Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Default, as to Defendants Diaz, Alvarez, Rodriguez, and Easton (in his individual capacity) be DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

REFLEX MEDIA, INC., a Nevada
)
corporation; and CLOVER 8 INVESTMENTS )
PTE. LTD., a Singapore corporation,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
RICHARD EASTON LIMITED, a Delaware )
corporation, d/b/a www.FirstDateClub.com; )
RICHARD EASTON, an individual; MARIA )
JOSE DIAZ, an individual; NELIDA TEJEDA )
ALVAREZ, an individual; JORGE OSBALDO)
RODRIGUEZ, an individual; and DOES 1-10, )
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 2:20-cv-00051-GMN-EJY
ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States

15

Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah, (ECF No. 51), which recommends that Plaintiffs’ Request

16

for Entry of Default, (ECF No. 33), as to Defendants Maria Diaz, Nelida Alvarez, Jorge

17

Rodriguez, and Richard Easton (in his individual capacity) be denied without prejudice.

18

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a

19

United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);

20

D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo

21

determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,

22

or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

23

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court

24

is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an

25

objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized

Page 1 of 2

1

that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

2

where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

3

1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

4
5

Here, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Non-Objection to the Report and Recommendation,
(ECF No. 52).

6

Accordingly,

7

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 51), is

8
9

ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Request for Entry of Default, (ECF No.

10

33), as to Defendants Diaz, Alvarez, Rodriguez, and Easton (in his individual capacity) be

11

DENIED without prejudice.

12

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs be advised to refile their Motion for Entry

13

of Clerk’s Default as to Defendants Diaz, Alvarez, and Rodriguez, and that once default is

14

entered, Plaintiffs proceed with a motion for default judgment against all Defendants except

15

Easton in his individual capacity.

16

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs be advised that default and/or default

17

judgment cannot be pursued against Easton, in his individual capacity, at this time because he is

18

currently participating in the litigation.

19

19
DATED this ____ day of November, 2021.

20
21
22

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
United States District Court

23
24
25

Page 2 of 2