Reflex Media, Inc. et al v. Richard Easton Limited et al
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 51 Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 33 Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Default, as to Defendants Diaz, Alvarez, Rodriguez, and Easton (in his individual capacity) be DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
REFLEX MEDIA, INC., a Nevada
corporation; and CLOVER 8 INVESTMENTS )
PTE. LTD., a Singapore corporation,
RICHARD EASTON LIMITED, a Delaware )
corporation, d/b/a www.FirstDateClub.com; )
RICHARD EASTON, an individual; MARIA )
JOSE DIAZ, an individual; NELIDA TEJEDA )
ALVAREZ, an individual; JORGE OSBALDO)
RODRIGUEZ, an individual; and DOES 1-10, )
Case No.: 2:20-cv-00051-GMN-EJY
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah, (ECF No. 51), which recommends that Plaintiffs’ Request
for Entry of Default, (ECF No. 33), as to Defendants Maria Diaz, Nelida Alvarez, Jorge
Rodriguez, and Richard Easton (in his individual capacity) be denied without prejudice.
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a
United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);
D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo
determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,
or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court
is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an
objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized
Page 1 of 2
that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
Here, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Non-Objection to the Report and Recommendation,
(ECF No. 52).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 51), is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Request for Entry of Default, (ECF No.
33), as to Defendants Diaz, Alvarez, Rodriguez, and Easton (in his individual capacity) be
DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs be advised to refile their Motion for Entry
of Clerk’s Default as to Defendants Diaz, Alvarez, and Rodriguez, and that once default is
entered, Plaintiffs proceed with a motion for default judgment against all Defendants except
Easton in his individual capacity.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs be advised that default and/or default
judgment cannot be pursued against Easton, in his individual capacity, at this time because he is
currently participating in the litigation.
DATED this ____ day of November, 2021.
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
United States District Court
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?