Franklin v. Hernandez et al
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Extend Time; Motions due by 8/16/2021. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/15/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
Amy A. Porray (Bar. No. 9565)
Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 486-0661 (phone)
(702) 486-3773 (fax)
Email: aporray@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Diana Hernandez
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11 JJEFFREY LYNN FRANKLIN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
HERNANDEZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
Case No. 2:20-CV-00063-RFB-DJA
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
16
17
Defendant, Diana Hernandez, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada
18
Attorney General, and Amy A. Porray, Deputy Attorney General, of the State of Nevada,
19
Office of the Attorney General, request this Court extend the deadline to file the Motion for
20
Summary Judgment from July 14, 2021, to August 16, 2021. This is the first request.
21
I.
INTRODUCTION
22
Defendant, Diana Hernandez, respectfully requests this Court grant this request to
23
extend the deadline to file the Motion for Summary Judgment. Good cause exists because
24
counsel has had a serious medical emergency that required her to take extended medical
25
leave and has affected all dates and deadlines in her cases.
26
///
27
///
28
///
30
Page 1 of 5
1
II.
BACKGROUND
2
Plaintiff, Jeffrey Lynn Franklin sues Hernandez for alleged constitutional violations
3
occurring while he was lawfully incarcerated in the Nevada Department of Corrections.
4
ECF No. 10. Since filing suit, Franklin has been released from prison. ECF No. 7, 24. On
5
June 15, 2021, Hernandez served her Initial Disclosures. To date, Franklin has not done
6
disclosures nor propounded any discovery requests. Hernandez’s counsel was also
7
contacting various declarants in preparation of the motion for summary judgment.
8
Additionally, Hernandez’s counsel was scheduled for annual leave, beginning July 6, 2021,
9
and returning July 13, 2021. The instant motion for summary judgment would have been
10
completed prior to counsel’s leave, and then reviewed, edited and approved during her leave
11
and timely filed upon her return.
12
However, in the very late hours of Thursday, July 1, 2021/very early morning of
13
Friday, July 2, 2021 (counsel is unsure of the time), counsel suffered a serious medical
14
episode. See Declaration of Amy A. Porray. Counsel’s live-in partner took her to the nearest
15
hospital emergency room. Id. Following discharge, counsel was given instructions not to
16
return to work in any capacity until her follow up with medical specialists. Id.
17
Counsel was placed on emergency medical leave beginning Friday, July 2, 2021. The
18
end of the following week, counsel met with her medical specialist who ordered further
19
specialized testing and allowed for a subsequent return to work. Id. Counsel returned to
20
work on Monday, July 12, 2021. Id. Although, counsel is diligently working to get caught
21
up on all cases, she must remain cognizant of her provider’s treatment recommendations
22
and the limitations posed by her physical abilities. Id. As of now, counsel is not at full
23
working capacity.
24
25
Counsel does not have a current telephone number for Franklin or an email address
and was not able to speak with him prior to the filing of the instant motion.
26
All of counsel’s cases, dates and deadlines have been affected. As a result, Defendant
27
respectfully requests that this Court grant her request for 30 days to file the Motion for
28
Summary Judgment.
30
Page 2 of 5
1
III.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
2
District courts have inherent power to control their dockets. Hamilton Copper &
3
Steel Corp. v. Primary Steel, Inc., 898 F.2d 1428, 1429 (9th Cir. 1990); Oliva v. Sullivan,
4
958 F.2d 272, 273 (9th Cir. 1992). Rule 6(b)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, governs
5
extensions of time:
6
When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the
court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without
motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before
the original time or its extension expires; or (B) on motion made
after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of
excusable neglect.
7
8
9
10
“The proper procedure, when additional time for any purpose is needed, is to present
11
to the Court a timely request for an extension before the time fixed has expired (i.e., a
12
request presented before the time then fixed for the purpose in question has expired).”
13
Canup v. Miss. Valley Barge Line Co., 31 F.R.D. 282, 283 (D. Pa. 1962). The Canup Court
14
explained that “the practicalities of life” (such as an attorney’s “conflicting professional
15
engagements” or personal commitments such as vacations, family activities, illnesses, or
16
death) often necessitate an enlargement of time to comply with a court deadline. Id.
17
Counsel’s unforeseeable medical emergency, which led to an extended medical
18
absence and a complete inability to work demonstrates good cause. Counsel has actively
19
and responsibly participated in the instant litigation. Counsel was on track to timely file
20
the instant motion for summary judgment. However, now all of counsel’s cases and their
21
accompanying dates and deadlines have been affected.
22
Franklin has been released from incarceration since the filing of the instant action.
23
He has not participated in discovery. Accordingly, a short continuance will not be
24
prejudicial to him. Counsel brings this motion in the very best of faith and not for the
25
purposes of delay.
26
IV.
CONCLUSION
27
Hernandez’s motion for an extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment
28
should be granted due to counsel’s serious injury. Hernandez requests an extension from
30
Page 3 of 5
1
the current due date of July 14, 2021, to August 16, 2021. This motion is brought in good
2
faith and not for the purposes of delay.
3
DATED July 14, 2021.
4
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
5
By: /s/ Amy A. Porray
Amy A. Porray (Bar. No. 9596)
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendant
6
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED
13
_________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
DATED: July 15, 2021
12
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
Page 4 of 5
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I certify that I am an employee of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General,
3
and that on July 14, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing DEFENDANT’S MOTION
4
TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
5
(FIRST REQUEST) via this Court’s electronic filing system. Parties who are registered
6
with this Court’s electronic filing system will be served electronically.
7
8
Jeffrey Lynn Franklin
4414 E. Flamingo Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
9
10
11
12
/s/ Natasha D. Petty
An employee of the
Office of the Nevada Attorney General
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
Page 5 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
AMY A. PORRAY (Bar No. 9596)
Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 East Washington Ave., #3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 486-3216 (phone)
(702) 486-3773 (fax)
Email: aporray@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Defendant,
Diana Hernandez
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
JJEFFREY LYNN FRANKLIN,
12
Case No. 2:20-CV-00063-RFB-DJA
Plaintiff,
13
14
DECLARATION OF DEPUTY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
AMY A. PORRAY
v.
HERNANDEZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
I, Amy A. Porray, hereby attest that the following statements to the best of my
knowledge are true and correct.
1.
I am employed as a Deputy Attorney General (DAG) in the Office of the
20
Nevada Attorney General (OAG). I am employed in the Public Safety Division,
21
Nevada Department of Corrections.
22
2.
That I am competent to provide the instant Declaration.
23
3.
I represent the Defendant, Diana Hernandez, in the instant action.
24
4.
That I provide this Declaration in support of my request for an extension of
time to file a motion for summary judgment.
25
26
5.
That the due date to file a motion for summary judgment is July 14, 2021.
27
6.
That I was scheduled for annual leave to commence on July 6, 2021, with a
28
30
return date of July 14, 2021.
Page 1 of 2
1
7.
2
3
That in preparation for annual leave, prepared a litigation schedule to meet
all dates and deadlines for her caseload while on annual leave.
8.
That, due to the deadline in the instant case occurring on July 14, 2021, I
4
scheduled the litigation-preparation dates of July 1-5, 2021, for the drafting
5
and finalization of the instant motion.
6
9.
7
8
That I had also been working on the document preparation and contacting
declarants for the instant motion prior to July 1, 2021.
10.
9
That very late Thursday night (July 1, 2021)/early Friday morning (July 2,
2021), I suffered an incredibly serious medical episode. I do not remember the
10
time.
11
11.
That I went to the emergency room.
12
12.
That my medical episode was so serious that, in addition to all other medically
13
related concerns, my live-in partner immediately cancelled our annual leave
14
vacation based on injury severity, medical direction, the necessity of follow up
15
visits with specialists and specialized testing.
16
13.
That I was on medical leave from July 2—until July 12, 2021.
17
14.
That I was not permitted to work during medical leave.
18
15.
That I am still not able to work at full capacity.
19
16.
That I have been doing my utmost diligence to comply with all cases, dates
20
and deadlines since returning to work.
21
17.
22
Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1746, I declare under penalty of
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
That I bring this motion in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Executed this 14th day of July, 2021.
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
By: /s/ Amy A. Porray
Amy A. Porray (Bar No. 9596)
Deputy Attorney General
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?