Padilla v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 45

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that any opposition to 40 plaintiff's motion for leave to file supplemental complaint must be filed on or before 5/16/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/9/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Case 2:20-cv-00066-KJD-VCF Document 45 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 1

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***
RAYMOND PADILLA,

4

Plaintiff(s),
2:20-cv-00066-KJD-VCF
ORDER

5
6
7

v.
OFFICER R. KNICKERBOCKER AND
OFFICER D. REITZ,
Defendant(s).

8

Before me is plaintiff’s motion for leave to file supplemental complaint (ECF No. 40).
9

No opposition has been filed and the time to file an opposition has passed.
10

Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any
11

motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees, constitutes a consent to
12

the granting of the motion.
13

Accordingly,
14

I ORDER that any opposition to plaintiff’s motion for leave to file supplemental complaint (ECF
15

No. 40) must be filed on or before May 16, 2022. If defendants do not file an opposition by May 16, 2022,
16

plaintiff’s motion for leave to file supplemental complaint (ECF No. 40) may be granted.
17

DATED this 9th day of May 2022.
18

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1