Potter v. Crane Co. et al

Filing 356

ORDER granting 355 Stipulation Re: 324 Motion to Dismiss, Replies due by 7/30/2021. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/15/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Jay J. Schuttert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8656 Alexandria L. Layton, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14228 EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP 6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Telephone: 702-805-0290 Facsimile: 702-805-0291 Email: jschuttert@efstriallaw.com Email: alayton@efstriallaw.com Attorneys for Defendants Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Goodrich Corporation and Titeflex Commercial, Inc. Stephen C. Musilli (appearing pro hac vice) VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP 52 East Gay Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone: 614-464-6494 Email: scmusilli@vorys.com Attorneys for Defendant Goodrich Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP 6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 14 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 15 16 JORDAN J. POTTER, 17 Plaintiff, 18 vs. 19 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS, individually and as successor in interest to Arrowhead Rubber Company, et al. 20 21 Defendants. 22 Case No.: 2:20-cv-00276-RFB-VCF JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT GOODRICH CORPORATION TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (SECOND REQUEST) 23 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Defendant Goodrich 25 Corporation and Plaintiff Jordan J. Potter, through their respective counsel, that the time for 26 Defendant Goodrich to file its Reply In Support of its Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of 27 Personal Jurisdiction be extended for 14 days, up to and including July 30, 2021. This request is 28 made in good faith and not for any delay. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Jordan J. Potter v. Arrowhead Products, et al. Case No. 2:20-cv-00276-RFB-VCF Joint Stipulation and Order for Extension of time for Defendant Goodrich Corporation to File its Reply in Support of its Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Accordingly, for good cause showing, the parties have agreed to an extension of time, up to and including July 30, 2021, for Defendant Goodrich to file its Reply In Support of its Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. Dated this 14th day of July, 2021. 10 EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP CRAIG P. KENNY & ASSOCIATES 11 By: /s/ Jay J. Schuttert Jay J. Schuttert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8656 Alexandria L. Layton, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14228 By: /s/ Lawrence E. Mittin Lawrence E. Mittin, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 005428 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Attorneys for Defendants Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Goodrich Corporation and Titeflex Commercial, Inc. VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP By: /s/ Stephen C. Musilli Stephen C. Musilli, Esq. Admitted pro hac vice 24 By: /s/ Lorette Fisher T. Barton French, Jr. Nevada Bar No. 5641 Jackalyn A. Olinger Rochelle Admitted Pro Hac Vice Lorrette Fisher, New York Admitted Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff Jordan Potter Attorneys for Defendant Goodrich Corporation 22 23 MAUNE RAICHLE HARTLEY FRENCH & MUDD, LLC IT IS SO ORDERED. ORDER _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 July 15, 2021 DATED: _______________________________ 27 CASE NO.: 2:20-cv-00276-RFB-VCF 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?