Gouthro v. Tesla Motors Inc

Filing 10

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that #6 , #7 Tesla's Motion to Compel Arbitration, is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is STAYED pending resolution of the claims which must be arbitrated. Upon conclusion of arbitration, the parties shall jointly file a notice with the Court addressing the need for additional proceedings. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/31/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 SEAN GOUTHRO, 4 5 Plaintiff, vs. 6 TESLA MOTORS, INC., 7 Defendant. 8 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:20-cv-00286-GMN-BNW ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.’s (“Tesla’s”) Motion to 10 Compel Arbitration, (ECF Nos. 6, 7). Tesla contends that Plaintiff Sean Gouthro (“Plaintiff”) 11 executed a binding arbitration agreement while employed with Tesla—which purportedly 12 encompasses Plaintiff’s first, second, and fourth claims for breach of contract, breach of the 13 covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and tortious discharge against public policy. (Compl. 14 ¶¶ 33–47, 56–61, ECF No. 1). On March 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Non-Opposition 15 to Tesla’s Motion to Compel Arbitration, (ECF No. 9). Pursuant to this District’s Local Rule 7- 16 2(d), Plaintiff’s non-opposition constitutes consent to granting Tesla’s Motion. 17 Accordingly, 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Tesla’s Motion to Compel Arbitration, (ECF Nos. 6, 19 20 7), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is STAYED pending resolution of the 21 claims which must be arbitrated. Upon conclusion of arbitration, the parties shall jointly file a 22 notice with the Court addressing the need for additional proceedings. 23 24 25 31 DATED this _____ day of March, 2020. ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?