Kohli v. Dayal et al

Filing 242

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that if Kohli is still seeking default judgment against these companies, he must file renewed motions for default judgment against defendants Quantified Investments LLC, Pacific Bay Lending Group, and Miss Elegant Expo on or befo re February 10, 2025. Any opposition to the motion will be due within fourteen days of the motion being filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Kohli is no longer seeking default judgment against any one of these companies, he must file notice with the court by February 10, 2025. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 1/27/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 4 Eric Kohli, 5 Case No. 2:20-cv-00538-CDS-NJK Plaintiff 6 v. 7 Ajay G. Dayal, et al., 8 Order Directing Plaintiff to File Renewed Motions for Default Judgment against Quantified Investment Group, LLC, Pacific Bay Lending Group, and Miss Elegant Expo Defendants 9 10 This employment and breach of contract action was brought by plaintiff Eric Kohli, a 11 lawyer who represented himself pro se, against defendant Ajay Dayal, Quantified Investment 12 Group, LLC, Pacific Bay Lending Group, and Miss Elegant Expo, for failure to pay Kohli for 13 work he performed as part of an employment contract. See generally First am. compl. (FAC), ECF 14 No. 17. The case proceeded to a four-day jury trial against Dayal only in November 2024. At the 15 conclusion of trial, the jury found in favor of Kohli on his breach of contract, unjust enrichment, 16 fraud, fair labor standards act, and Nevada wage claims for relief. See Verdict, ECF No. 233. 17 Before trial, Kohli filed a motion for default judgment against all defendants, which I 18 denied without prejudice. Order denying default, ECF No. 203. Therein, I explained that after 19 weighing the Eitel factors and applying the Frow doctrine I declined to enter default judgment. Id. 20 As the jury has now returned a verdict against Dayal, there is no need to enter default against 21 him. However, Kohli still seeks a judgment against all defendants “jointly and severally.” See ECF 22 No. 17. Thus, the court issues this order directing Kohli to file a renewed motion for default 23 judgment if he is still seeking that relief against Quantified Investment Group LLC, Pacific Bay 24 Lending Group, and Miss Elegant Expo. If he is, Kohli must file a new motion for default 25 judgment addressing each of the Eitel factors. 26 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if Kohli is still seeking default judgment against these 2 companies, he must file renewed motions for default judgment against defendants Quantified 3 Investments LLC, Pacific Bay Lending Group, and Miss Elegant Expo on or before February 10, 4 2025. Any opposition to the motion will be due within fourteen days of the motion being filed. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Kohli is no longer seeking default judgment against 6 any one of these companies, he must file notice with the court by February 10, 2025. 7 8 9 Dated: January 27, 2025 ____________________ ____________ Cristina D. Silva United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?