Kush, Inc. v. Van Vranken

Filing 90

ORDER. IT IS SO ORDERED that discovery-related documents must be served on opposing counsel, not filed on the docket unless ordered by the Court, Docket Nos. [79}- 89 . The Court STRIKES the above-referenced documents, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so.FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER AND WITH THE GOVERNING RULES MORE GENERALLY MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/7/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00647-APG-NJK Document 90 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 KUSH, INC., 9 Case No. 2:20-cv-00647-APG-NJK Plaintiff(s), 8 Order v. 10 11 [Docket Nos. 79-89] FRANK VAN VRANKEN, Defendant(s). 12 On August 31, 2021, the Court struck Defendant’s notice of deposition as improperly filed 13 on the docket, rather than served on opposing counsel. Docket No. 77. Now pending before the 14 Court is Defendant’s filing of 11 more notices regarding service of discovery materials. Docket 15 Nos. 79-89. 16 Discovery-related documents must be served on opposing counsel, not filed on the 17 docket unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No 18 such order has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above-referenced 19 documents, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in 20 the future absent a Court order that they do so. 21 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER AND WITH THE GOVERNING 22 RULES MORE GENERALLY MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: January 7, 2022 25 ______________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?