Barragan v. Early Warning Services, LLC et al

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 13 Motion to Dismiss (First Request). Responses due by 7/13/2020. Replies due by 7/27/2020. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
5510 So. Fort Apache Rd, Suite 30
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

11

David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC
2850 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 200
Henderson, NV 89052
Phone: [phone], Ext. 101
Email: [e-mail]

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff

8
9
10

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

15
16
17
18
19
20

HUGO BARRAGAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC; THE
RETAIL EQUATION; and
BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM,

23
24
25
26
27
28
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
5510 S Fort Apache Rd, Ste 30
Las Vegas, NV 89148
[phone]

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST]
Complaint filed: May 4, 2020

Defendants.

21
22

Case No. 2:20-cv-00795-KJD-VCF

Plaintiff Hugo Barragan (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record, and Defendant
The Retail Equation (“Retail Equation”) have agreed and stipulated to the following:
1.

On May 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].

2.

On June 15, 2020, Retail Equation filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF

Dkt.13].
3.

Plaintiff’s Response is due June 29, 2020.

4.

1

Plaintiff and Retail Equation have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s response fourteen

2

days in order to allow the Parties to continue working toward an informal resolution, and to extend

3

Retail Equation’s deadline to file a reply in support of its motion for fourteen days for the same

4

reasons. As a result, both Plaintiff and Retail Equation hereby request this Court to further extend

5
6
7

the date for Plaintiff to respond to Retail Equation’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint until July 13,
2020, and to extend the date for Retail Equation to file their Reply until July 27, 2020.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

///

27
28
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
5510 S Fort Apache Rd, Ste 30
Las Vegas, NV 89148
[phone]

2 of 3

1
2
3
4

5.

This stipulation is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed

for an improper purpose.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated June 26, 2020
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC

LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP

/s/ Matthew I. Knepper
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq., SBN 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq., SBN 13848
5510 So. Fort Apache Rd, Suite 30
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

/s/ J. Christopher Jorgensen
J. Christopher Jorgensen, Esq., SBN 5382
Matthew R. Tsai, Esq., SBN 14290
3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5996
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC
David H. Krieger, Esq., SBN 9086
2850 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway, Suite 200
Henderson, NV 89052
Email: [e-mail]

15

MAYER BROWN LLP
John Nadolenco, Esq.
(Pro hac vice application submitted)
Email: [e-mail]
Daniel D. Queen, Esq.
(Pro hac vice application submitted)
Email: [e-mail]
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071

16

Counsel for Defendant The Retail Equation

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

17
18
19
20
21

Counsel for Plaintiff

ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO DISMISS
IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22

6/30/20
Dated: _________________

23
24
25
26
27

Barragan v. Early Warning Services, LLC et al
Case No.: 2:20-cv-00795-KJD-VCF

28
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
5510 S Fort Apache Rd, Ste 30
Las Vegas, NV 89148
[phone]

3 of 3