Toll v. Nevada Property 1 LLC
ORDER Denying 11 Stipulation FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) re Discovery without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Case 2:20-cv-00929-KJD-DJA Document 12 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:20-cv-00929-KJD-DJA
NEVADA PROPERTY 1, LLC,
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Discovery Dates
(ECF No. 11), filed on February 10, 2021. The Court has reviewed the stipulation and finds that
it does not comply with LR 26-3. “A motion or stipulation to extend a discovery deadline . . .
must include: (a) A statement specifying the discovery completed; (b) A specific description of
the discovery that remains to be completed; (c) The reasons why the deadline was not satisfied or
the remaining discovery was not completed within the time limits set by the discovery plan; and
(d) A proposed schedule for completing all remaining discovery.” LR 26-3. Based on the
information provided in the stipulation, the Court is unable to evaluate the progress the parties
have made since their first stipulation to extend discovery. The Court will therefore deny the
stipulation without prejudice. The parties are directed to file a stipulation that complies with
Local Rule 26-3, with specific emphasis on describing the discovery completed to date and the
discovery that remains to be completed. See LR 26-3(a)-(d).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation Extending Discovery Dates
(ECF No. 11) is denied without prejudice.
DATED: February 16, 2021
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?