Duca v. Flagstar Bank, FSB

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to 1 Complaint. Flagstar Bank, FSB answer due 10/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Case 2:20-cv-00993-GMN-NJK Document 18 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 3
19
10/14/20
2

1
2
3
4
5
6

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Darren T. Brenner, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13146
7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
[phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant, Flagstar Bank, FSB

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9

GLENNA M. DUCA,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,
vs.
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB,

13

Case No.: 2:20-cv-00993-GMN-NJK
ORDER GRANTING
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (SIXTH
REQUEST)

Defendant.

14
15

Plaintiff, Glenna M. Duca (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Flagstar Bank, FSB. (“Flagstar”)

16

(collectively the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as

17

follows:

18

On June 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Flagstar was served with

19

Plaintiff’s Complaint on June 5, 2020. As such, Flagstar’s original deadline to respond to the

20

Complaint was June 26, 2020. The Court extended that deadline to July 27, 2020 via an Order

21

Granting Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 9]. The

22

Court extended that deadline to August 17, 2020 via an Order granting Flagstar’s Unopposed

23

Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 11]. The Court again

24

extended the deadline to September 8, 2020, via an Order Granting Joint Motion to Extend

25

Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 13]. The Court extended the deadline

26

for a fourth time to September 29, 2020, via an Order Granting Joint Motion to Extend Deadline

27

to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 15]. The deadline for Flagstar to respond to

28

Plaintiff’s complaint was later extended a sixth time to October 13, 2020 [ECF No. 17].

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:20-cv-00993-GMN-NJK Document 18 Filed 10/13/20 Page 2 of 3
19
10/14/20
2

1

The Parties have engaged in settlement discussions but recently determined settlement is

2

unlikely. The Parties have discussed extending the deadline for Flagstar to respond to Plaintiff’s

3

Complaint by one additional week.

4
5

WHEREAS, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Flagstar to
file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint to October 20, 2020.

6

This is the sixth stipulation for extension of time for Flagstar to file its responsive

7

pleading. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to

8

any other party. The parties do no anticipate requesting any further extensions.

9
10
11

As part of this stipulation, Flagstar agrees to participate in any Rule 26(f) conference that
occurs during the pendency of this extension.
DATED this 13th day of October, 2020.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP

FREEDOM LAW FIRM, LLC

/s/ Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq.
Darren T. Brenner, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13146
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Defendant, Flagstar Bank, FSB

/s/ George Haines, Esq.
George Haines, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9411
8985 South Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Glenna M. Duca

19
20
21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED:
___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26

DATED:

27
28

Page 2 of 3

_________________________
October 14, 2020