Castronovo-Flihan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Stipulation; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company answer due 10/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 10/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Case 2:20-cv-01197-JCM-DJA Document 10 Filed 10/16/20 Page 1 of 2

1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN
Nevada Bar No. 3062
2 E-Mail: [e-mail]
PAMELA L. McGAHA
3 Nevada Bar No. 8181
E-Mail: [e-mail]
4 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
702.893.3383
6 FAX: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
7 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

10

***

11 GINA CASTRONOVO-FLIHAN,

CASE NO. 2:20-cv-1197 -JCM-DJA

12

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN
ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign
15 company; AND DOES I through V, inclusive
16

Defendants.

17
18

COMES NOW DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

19 COMPANY (“State Farm” or “Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, the law firm of
20 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, and PLAINTIFF, GINA CASTRONOVA21 FLIHAN, by and through her counsel of record, BROCK K. OHLSON PLLC, hereby stipulate
22 and agree that the time for Defendant to file its Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint be extended as set
23 forth herein. Defendant State Farm’s Answer is currently due October 16, 2020. The parties
24 hereby stipulate that the due date for Defendant’s Answer be extended to October 23, 2020. The
25 parties also stipulate and agree that the extension is for Defendant State Farm to file an Answer
26 only, not a Motion to Dismiss.
27 …

LEWIS

28 …

BRISBOIS

BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

4811-1958-3951.1

Case 2:20-cv-01197-JCM-DJA Document 10 Filed 10/16/20 Page 2 of 2

1
2

Reason for Extension
Because of the complexity and extent of the allegations and claims made in Plaintiff’s

3 Complaint, Defendant requires additional time to prepare its Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint. This
4 stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
5

This is the first extension of time requested for filing Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s

6 Complaint.
7

DATED this 16th day of October, 2020.

DATED this 16th day of October, 2020.

8

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH

BROCK K. OHLSON PLLC

9

/s/ Pamela L. McGaha
ROBERT W. FREEMAN
Nevada Bar No. 3062
PAMELA L. MCGAHA
Nevada Bar No. 8181
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendant

/s/ Ian McMenemy
BROCK K. OHLSON
Nevada Bar No. 12262
IAN M. MCMENEMY
Nevada Bar No. 13190
JUSTIN A. CORNE
Nevada Bar No. 14504
6060 Elton Avenue, Suite A
Las Vegas, NV 89107
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11
12
13
14
15

ORDER

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

Dated this __ day of 2020
October 19, ______________, 2020.

19
_______________________________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LEWIS

28

BRISBOIS

BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

4811-1958-3951.1

2